Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
SS Exports – Appellant
Versus
Ark Shipping Co. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to set aside the order (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background of the dispute and arbitration process (Para 3 , 4 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. judgment-debtor's objections in execution proceedings (Para 5 , 6 , 18) |
| 4. executing court's analysis and findings (Para 7 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. petitioner argues on public policy and procedural issues (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. interpreting 'public policy' related to foreign awards (Para 19 , 25 , 28) |
| 7. enforcement of foreign awards under specific provisions (Para 23 , 24 , 26 , 27) |
| 8. court's rationale to uphold award (Para 32 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 9. conclusion and dismissal of the writ petition (Para 37 , 38) |
ORDER :
S VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J.
1. This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed seeking for the following reliefs:-
"1. Issue an appropriate writ or order, setting aside the impugned order dated 16.09.2022 passed in Execution Case No.15180/2005 by the XIII Addl. City Civil Judge, Mayo Hall, Bangalore, which is produced at Annexure-A to the writ petition;
2. Issue an appropriate writ or order or direction in the nature of declaration by declaring to the effect that the impugned arbitral award presented for recognition
The enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is upheld unless specific procedural or public policy violations are proven, which was not established in ....
Point of law : Section 34 of English Arbitration Act deals with procedural and evidential matters.
Enforcement of a foreign arbitral award is granted under Section 48 of the Arbitration Act, emphasizing limited grounds for refusal based on public policy, requiring strong evidence of violation.
Enforcement of foreign awards under Section 48 bars merits re-review; tribunal findings on deemed acceptance, contract validity via past dealings upheld unless perverse; ad-hoc agreement overrides ru....
Point of Law : New York Convention recognizes that an award may not be enforced where it is predicated on a subject matter outside the jurisdiction of the arbitrator.
The enforceability of a foreign arbitral award under the A&C Act requires specificity in the award; vague declarations cannot be executed until all pertinent elements are resolved.
The enforcement of a foreign arbitral award cannot be resisted on merits, and the validity of an assignment under Sudanese law was upheld, confirming the binding nature of arbitration agreements.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
