SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 110

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
Murugan – Appellant
Versus
Mohanraj – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : S. Natarajan
For the Respondent: A.P. Neelamegavannan

JUDGMENT :

K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.

1. This Second Appeal is preferred as against the decree and judgment dated 13.06.2023 passed in A.S. No.22 of 2020, on the file of the Principal District Court, Villupuram, reversing the Judgment and decree dated 26.07.2019 passed in O.S. No.95 of 2015, on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Court, Villupuram.

2. The unsuccessful defendants before the first appellate Court have preferred the present Second Appeal. The respondent as plaintiff filed the above suit in O.S. No.95/2015 on the file of the II Additional Sub Court, Villupuram, against the defendant Murugan, for the relief of specific performance of the sale agreement dated 01.03.2012 marked as Ex.A1, which has been notarized on 03.03.2012. The 2nd defendant is the subsequent purchaser, while the appeal was pending. The trial court, partly decreed the suit directing the 1st defendant to repay a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with interest and dismissed the specific performance relief and the counter claim of returning certain document was allowed, against which, the plaintiff preferred the appeal suit in A.S. No.22/2020 on the file of Principal District Judge, Villupuram. The first appel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top