SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 5369

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.MURALI SHANKAR
Gunasundari – Appellant
Versus
R.Velumani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.R.Suriya Narayanan
For the Respondent: Mr.N.Vallinayagam

Table of Content
1. appeal against trial court's decree. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. plaintiff's claims of specific performance. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. regulatory requirement of readiness. (Para 17 , 20)
4. trial and appellate courts' findings confirmed. (Para 22 , 27)
5. final ruling on dismissal of appeal. (Para 29 , 30)

JUDGMENT :

The Second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.9 of 2025, dated 18.09.2025 on the file of the Principal District Court, Theni, confirming the judgment and decree, made in O.S.No.223 of 2024, dated 12.11.2024 on the file of the Sub Court, Bodinayakanuur.

3. The sole defendant filed a written statement and contested the suit. Pending suit, the sole defendant died and his wife and sons were impleaded as defendants 2 to 4 and they have also filed written statement and proceeded with the suit. The learned Subordinate Judge, framing necessary issues and after filing written statement of defendants 2 to 4, additional issues were framed. After full trial, the learned Subordinate Judge passed a judgment and decree, dated 12.11.2024, granting the relief of specific performance and permanent injunction as sought for. Aggrieved by the said

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top