SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 162

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
N.MALA
P. Mariappan – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : S. Titus
For the Respondent: B. Nambi Selvan

Table of Content
1. discharge petition arising from corruption allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. counterarguments regarding the validity of the charges. (Para 6 , 8 , 9)
3. court's observations on merits and stage of discharge. (Para 7 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. final dismissal of the revision. (Para 17)

ORDER :

1. This Criminal Revision is filed to set aside the order dated 13.08.2025 dismissing the discharge petition filed by the petitioners in Crl.M.P.No.12 of 2025 in S.C.No.3 of 2023 to discharge the petitioners from the alleged offence punishable under Sections 120 -B, 167 r/w 34 IPC and Section 13 (2) r/w 13(1)(d)(i)(ii)(iii) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, in the charge sheet.

2. The brief case of the prosecution:

The defacto complainant by name, C.Kipson, gave a complaint stating that the petitioners had issued transfer order dated 24.05.2010 to two teachers namely, L.Ponselvei and N.Kamalakanthimathi, by overlooking that the defacto complainant was entitled for preference for transfer on the basis of the G.O.Ms.No.(1D)131, School Education, E1 Department dated 28.04.2010. The defacto complainant had stated that the transfer order passed by the petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top