SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 170

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.MALA
S. Angusamy – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : S. Titus
For the Respondent: B. Nambi Selvan

Table of Content
1. general factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments raised by both parties. (Para 6 , 8 , 9)
3. court's evaluation of the trial court's decision. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. legal standards for discharge applications. (Para 14 , 15)
5. final conclusion of the court. (Para 17)

ORDER :

1. This Criminal Revision is filed to set aside the order dated 13.08.2025 dismissing the discharge petition filed by the petitioners in Crl.M.P.No.15 of 2025 in S.C. No.6 of 2023 to discharge the petitioners from the alleged offence punishable under Sections 120 -B, 167 r/w 34 IPC and Section 13 (2) r/w 13(1)(d)(i)(ii)(iii) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, in the charge sheet.

2. The brief case of the prosecution:

The defacto complainant by name, C.Kipson, gave a complaint stating that the petitioners had issued transfer order 07.11.2012 to two teachers namely, S.Bellsi Thangasudha and T.Ayyer, by overlooking that the defacto complainant was entitled for preference for transfer on the basis of G.O.Ms.No.(1D).No.259 dated 09.09.2011, G.O.Ms.No. (1D)158, dated 18.05.2012 School Education, E1 Department dated 28.04.2010. The defacto complainant had stated that the t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top