SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 188

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.MALA
N. George Stephenson – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : S. Titus
For the Respondent: B. Nambi Selvan

Table of Content
1. prosecution's case regarding illegal transfer orders. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. defence arguments against the charge. (Para 6 , 8 , 9)
3. court's analysis of the discharge application. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)

ORDER :

1. This Criminal Revision is filed to set aside the order dated 13.08.2025 dismissing the discharge petition filed by the petitioners in Crl. M.P. No.20 of 2025 in S.C. No.11 of 2023 to discharge the petitioners from the alleged offence punishable under Sections 120 -B, 167 r/w 34 IPC and Section 13 (2) r/w 13(1)(d)(i)(ii)(iii) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, in the charge sheet.

2. The brief case of the prosecution:

The defacto complainant by name, C.Kipson, gave a complaint stating that the petitioners had issued transfer order 07.11.2012 to two teachers namely, R.Kalaiselvi and C.R.Anitha, by overlooking that the defacto complainant was entitled for preference for transfer on the basis of G.O.Ms.No.(1D).No.129 dated 09.05.2013, G.O.Ms.No.(1D)158, dated 18.05.2012 School Education, E1 Department dated 28.04.2010. The defacto complainant had stated that the transfer order passed by the petitioners was illegal since it was issued for extra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top