SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 348

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Sounthar, J.
Nisha Anurag Lodha - Petitioner
Versus
Anurag Lodha S/o Vimal Chand Lodha - Respondent
CRP Nos. 2109 and 2712 of 2025 and CMP No.12284 of 2025
Decided On : 09-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms.V.Chethana
For the Respondent: Mrs.V.Anuradha

The court must ensure thorough consideration of financial responsibilities in interim maintenance cases, balancing the incomes of both parties while providing fair directions regarding educational expenses.

Headnote:(A) Family Courts Act - Interim Maintenance - The court directed respondent to pay Rs.50,000/- per month as interim maintenance for the petitioner's son and educational expenses, yet found no error in Family Court dismissing enhancement of maintenance - Petitioner represented claims regarding unpaid educational expenses for daughter denied by lower court - Judicial economy necessitated clear directions regarding financial responsibilities. (Paras 4, 6, 12, 14)

(B) Court's Role in Maintenance Cases - The court noted the necessity of hearing both parties before returning petitions without substantive orders - Emphasized the need for a meritorious examination of claims made by petitioners. (Paras 8, 14)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner filed for interim maintenance and alleged respondent's failure to comply with prior orders including payment of educational expenses for daughter studying abroad, resulting in significant debts for the petitioner. In her affidavit, she claimed diverse forms of income and assets. (Paras 3, 4, 5)

Findings of Court:
The Family Court was justified in concluding that the petitioner had sufficient income not to require interim maintenance and that the maintenance awarded for the son was reasonable. (Paras 12, 13)

Issues: Clarification on the respondent's obligations for educational expenses and the assessment of the petitioner's financial needs. (Paras 5, 10)

Ratio Decidendi: The court reinforced a procedural approach requiring thorough consideration of maintenance applications, particularly concerning the financial capabilities of both parties. (Paras 4, 8, 12)

Result: CRP No.2109 of 2025 allowed with direction to re-present petition; CRP No.2712 of 2025 dismissed.

Table of Content
1. overview of petitions filed regarding interim maintenance. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. court’s directive on maintainability of the petitioner’s application. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. discussion on the petitioner’s and respondent’s income and expenses. (Para 8 , 11)
4. assessment of interim maintenance requests and court’s conclusions. (Para 10 , 12 , 13)
5. final order regarding the petitions and confirmation of family court's order. (Para 14 , 15)

ORDER :

S. Sounthar, J.

CRP No.2109 of 2025 has been filed seeking a direction to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai to number the application filed by the petitioner/ wife seeking to strike off the pleadings of the respondent/husband for his failure to comply with the order of interim maintenance made in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in O.P.No.2134 of 2023, dated 30.12.2024.

2. CRP No.2712 of 2025 has been filed by the petitioner/wife seeking enhancement of interim maintenance awarded by the Family Court, Chennai in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in O.P.No.2134 of 2023.

3. It is not disputed that the respondent/husband filed the main original petition seeking dissolution of the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent that had taken place on 04.05.2001 on the ground of cruelty. Pending main O.P., the petitioner filed I.A.No.1 of 2023 seeking interim maintenance and also litigation expenses. The said interim application was partly allowed by directing the respondent/husband to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- per month to the petitioner's son, who is under custody of the petitioner, apart from the educational expenses of the son and daughter, till the disposal of the main petition.

4. As far as CRP No.2109 of 2025 is concerned, the same has been filed seeking a direction to the family court to number the application filed by the petitioner seeking to strike off the pleadings of the respondent/husband in O.P.No.2134 of 2023 for his failure to comply with the interim maintenance order passed in the above main petition. According to the petitioner, the respondent failed to pay educational expenses to the petitioner's daughter and the said fact was brought to the notice of the court by two memos dated 17.02.2025 and 15.03.2025. It is further stated by the petitioner that due to the refusal of the respondent to pay educational expenses to the petitioner's daughter, the petitioner was constrained to borrow money from her relatives and to make payment of Rs.12,13,994/- to her daughter’s education during September and November 2024. In view of the same, the petitioner filed an application seeking to strike off the pleadings of the respondent in the main OP and the same was returned by the court stating that no such order has been passed. Therefore, the instant civil revision petition has been filed seeking a direction to the family court to number the petition.

5. It is seen from the records that the petition filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to strike off the pleadings of the respondent in the main OP was returned by the family court on 15.04.2025 raising objections with regard to its maintainability. The petitioner re-presented the papers on 30.04.2025 by offering her explanations relying on the order dated 30.12.2024 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2023. However, the family court, again, returned the papers on 20.05.2025 stating that no such order was passed. Hence, the petitioner has come before this court.

6. The operative portion of the order passed by the Family Court in I.A.No.1 of 2023 dated 30.12.2024 reads as follows.

“In the result, the petition is partly allowed and the respondent is directed to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- per month to the petitioner's son towards interim maintenance apart from the educational expenses of son and daughter, from the date of this petition till the disposal of the main petition. The respondent shall clear the arrears within three months from today. The respondent shall continue to pay the monthly maintenance amount to the petitioner on or before the 10th of every English

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top