Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.VINOD KUMAR
A. Rajalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Director Of Collegiate Education – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial appointment process overview (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. controversy over qualifications for appointment (Para 6 , 8 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. selection committee procedure details (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. approval process for appointments (Para 18 , 19) |
| 5. arguments concerning the rights of the minority institution (Para 20 , 21) |
| 6. petitioner's claims on selection merit and process (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. court's observations on legal validity of claims (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 8. rules on wait lists and their interpretations (Para 30 , 31 , 34) |
| 9. rejection of informal communication claims (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 10. judicial precedent and its application to the case (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 11. court's substantive findings on fairness and transparency (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 12. final directives and orders of the court (Para 46 , 47) |
ORDER :
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Pleader for R1 and R2, learned senior counsel for R3 and the learned counsel appearing for R4 and perused the record.
3. The petitioner contended that the 3rd respondent had caused an advertisement on 12.08.2019 in the news papers inviting applications from eligible
The court held that the appointment of an Assistant Professor without possessing a Ph.D. qualification violated UGC Regulations and lacked transparency, warranting a fresh selection process.
The appointment of a candidate is invalid if they do not disclose current employment and fail to submit a mandatory no objection certificate during the selection process.
Employment and Service matter - Appointment as an Associate Professor in the School of Social Sciences of the Mahatma Gandhi University - Selection committee – Qualiification - Absence of post doctor....
The selection process for public service positions must comply with established guidelines and norms, and candidates can challenge the legality of the process even after participating in it if there ....
The court upheld the appointment of Respondent No.4 as Professor, confirming compliance with UGC eligibility criteria and validating the selection process conducted by the university.
The Selection Committee cannot alter the essential qualifications for a position once the selection process has commenced, and the Chancellor has the authority to terminate appointments that do not c....
Educational qualifications are essential for ensuring the quality of education and should not be overridden by teaching experience alone.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
