SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 999

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.
DR. PAWAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
INDIRA GANDHI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20694 of 2018
Decided On : 05-03-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Umesh Prasad Singh, Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Abhimanyu Vatsa, Mr. Rajni Kant Singh, Mr. Sameer Sawaran.
For the Respondents: Mr. P.K. Shahi, Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Rai, Mr. Ankit Katriar.

Headnote:

Service Law – Appointment – Post of Assistant Professor in IGIMS – Respondent No.4, who should have been given 46 marks, has illegally been appointed by selection committee and name of petitioner is shown in waiting list whereas petitioner should have been appointed as he got more marks than respondent No. 3 and 4 – Two vacancies are available, therefore, respondent No.3 has rightly been appointed but appointment of respondent No.4 cannot be sustained as he got only 46 marks much less than marks obtained by petitioner and his appointment is fit to be set aside – Appointment of respondent No.4 set aside – Respondent Nos.1 and 2 directed to consider case of petitioner for appointment on post of Assistant Professor (Orthopaedic), IGIMS, Patna in accordance with law. (Paras 28 to 31)

JUDGMENT :

Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.

1. Heard Mr. Umesh Prasad Singh, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner, Mr. P.K. Shahi, the learned senior counsel duly assisted by Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, the learned counsel, for the respondent No. 1 and 2, Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Rai, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 3, and Mr. Ankit Katriar, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 4.

2. The petitioner by filing this writ petition seeks quashing of the order of appointment of respondent No. 3 and 4 dated 19.09.2018 issued under the signature of Director, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna (hereinafter referred to as the IGIMS). The petitioner further prays for issuance of writ of Mandamus commanding the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Assistant Professor in pursuance to the advertisement No. 04/Faculty/IGIMS/Estt./2018 and to pass such other order/orders, direction/ directions as this court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

3. The facts bereft of unnecessary details but relevant for this case are that the petitioner did his MBBS from Patna Medical College Hospital, Patna in the year 2006. He also did his MS, Orthopedic from PMCH in the year 2011. The petitioner did his Senior Residency from IGIMS for the period 30th January, 2013 to 29th July, 2016. The petitioner applied for the post of Assistant Professor (Orthopedic) vide advertisement No. 04/Adhoc- Faculty appointment/IGIMS/Estt./2017 and he being eligible for the post was appointed as Assistant Professor, Orthopedic on adhoc basis. An advertisement No. 04/Faculty/ IGIMS/Estt./2018 was issued for appointment on Faculty posts for various departments in IGIMS. The petitioner also applied for appointment on the post. The petitioner was called for interview on 03.07.2018 but when result was published vide memo No. 3956/Admn dated 19.09.2018 the petitioner found his name in the waiting list. Respondent No. 3 and 4 were selected for appointment on the post of Assistant Professor, regular, in Orthopedic department. The petitioner, being dissatisfied and aggrieved with the appointment of respondent No. 3 and 4 on the ground that they have got lesser qualification and lesser experience as compared to the petitioner but they were appointed filed this writ petition.

4. Mr. Umesh Prasad Singh, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner, submits that petitioner was earlier appointed as Assistant Professor (Orthopedic) on adhoc basis after following the appointment procedure and he discharged his duties as Assistant Professor (Orthopedic) from 31.07.2017 to 30.04.2018. Four posts of Assistant Professors (Orthopedic) were again advertised (Annexure-P/4) and out of four posts three posts were for general category (unreserved) and one post was reserved for SC. It is submitted that according to advertisement (Annexure-P/4) the essential qualification for appointment on the post of Assistant Professor (Orthopedic) is that a candidate must have MBBS/MS/MD degree in subject concerned or an equivalent degree of recognized institution by the MCI as also three years teaching and/or research experience in recognized institution. It is further submitted that a committee was constituted for interviewing the candidates on the basis of their qualification.

5. The learned senior counsel further submits that petitioner got MBBS and MS degree in orthopedic from PMCH and also got four years teaching experience as Senior Residency and also Assistant Professor (Orthopedic) for the post on which substantive appointment to be made. The petitioner published nine journals out of which six are indexed journals and the petitioner is first author in two indexed journals and second author in other two indexed journals whereas in three non-indexed journals he is first author in two journals. When the merit list was

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top