SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 405

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SENTHILKUMAR
P.ATCHAMMAL – Appellant
Versus
G. Rajammmal (Died) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : V.P. Rajan
For the Respondent: A. Raja

ORDER :

1. C.R.P(MD)No.2783 of 2025 has been filed challenging the order passed by the learned District Munsif, Aundipatti, in I.A.No.16 of 2025 in O.S.No.178 of 2006, dated 11.09.2025.

2. C.R.P(MD)No.3817 of 2025 has been filed challenging the order passed by the learned District Munsif, Aundipatti, in I.A.No.18 of 2025 in O.S.No.178 of 2006, dated 27.11.2025.

3. C.R.P(MD)No.3818 of 2025 has been filed challenging the order passed by the learned District Munsif, Aundipatti, in I.A.No.19 of 2025 in O.S.No.178 of 2006, dated 27.11.2025.

4. The respondents herein, as plaintiffs, have filed a suit in O.S.No.178 of 2006, before the District Munsif Court, Aundipatti, seeking for partition and separate possession of their respective shares. During the pendency of the suit, the petitioners, who are the legal representatives of the deceased 8th defendant, have filed an application in I.A.No.16 of 2025 to accept the written statement filed by them as legal representatives of the deceased 8th defendant. The learned District Munsif, Aundipatti, vide impugned order, dated 11.09.2025, had dismissed the said application on the ground that the said application was filed only to drag on the proceeding

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top