Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VELMURUGAN, M.JOTHIRAMAN
K.P. Maghendhran – Appellant
Versus
Balakrishnan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of contempt appeals and allegations (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments against contempt finding (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's analysis on contempt jurisdiction (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16) |
| 4. finding of contempt is unsustainable (Para 17) |
| 5. conclusion and outcome of appeals (Para 18) |
JUDGMENT :
P. VELMURUGAN, J.
These appeals are filed under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to set aside the order dated 26.08.2013 passed in Cont.P.No.932 of 2012, whereby the appellant in Contempt Petition No.8 of 2013 was held guilty of contempt of court, and in respect of the appellant in Contempt Petition No.9 of 2013, a direction was issued for registration of a criminal case.
2. Contempt Appeal No.8 of 2013 has been filed by one K.P.Maghendran, who served as Director, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption during the relevant period and against whom a finding of guilt for contempt had been recorded by the learned Single Judge. Contempt Appeal No.9 of 2013 has been filed by Thiru R.Sathish Kumar Dogra, who was the Director, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption at the time of filing of the appeal. Though no personal finding of contempt had been recorded again
Non-registration of a criminal case due to lack of evidence does not constitute contempt of court under the Contempt of Courts Act, limited to willful disobedience of clear court orders.
Sufficient opportunity granted to the contemner for filing a reply is crucial in determining the maintainability of a criminal contempt reference.
The court must be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the contemnor has willfully, deliberately and intentionally violated the court's order. If the disobedience is the result of some compelling c....
A police officer who willfully and intentionally misrepresents before the court and violates a court order is guilty of contempt of court and is liable to be punished under the provisions of the Cont....
Civil contempt proceedings require specific notice of allegations to ensure fair opportunity for defense; penalties must reflect intent and context, particularly when apologies are tendered.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
