SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 242

RAVI MALIMATH, VISHAL MISHRA
In Reference (Suo Motu) – Appellant
Versus
Meenakshi Gajbhe – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Kunal Dubey for respondent.

ORDER

1. These suo motu proceedings were initiated in pursuance to a reference sent by the First Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhopal under section 15(2) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 1971’) for registration of a criminal contempt against respondent/accused Smt. Meenakshi Gajbhe w/o Shrikant Gajbhe with a prayer to punish her under Section 15(2) of the Act of 1971 as she has submitted applications before the Court levelling contemptuous allegations against the Presiding Officer.

2. The facts in nutshell are that a Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.186 of 2015 (Smt. Meenakshi Gajghe v. Shrikant K. Gajghe) under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is pending before the First Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhopal. During pendency of the case, the respondent/contemnor who is the applicant in the case has submitted applications dated 4.7.2018 and 18.7.2018 levelling contemptuous allegations against the Presiding Officer. Some other contemptuous acts committed by the contemnor have also been mentioned in the reference. A show cause notice was issued to the respondent/contemnor, but she refused to receive it. The Pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top