IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, C.KUMARAPPAN, JJ.
Shanmugha Arts, Science Technology & Research Academy (SASTRA) Deemed University, Thirumalaisamudram – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its secretary to Government, Revenue Department – Respondent
W.P. Nos.6989 and 6993 of 2022 and W.M.P. Nos.7019 and 7025 of 2022
Decided On : 09-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners' arguments against government decisions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. government's defense against re-litigation. (Para 6) |
| 4. observations on re-litigation and public policy. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. final decision on eviction notice enforcement. (Para 10) |
ORDER :
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
Present Writ Petitions are third round of litigations by the petitioners. Longevity of these re-litigations is about 30 years. Issues are already adjudicated and reached finality upto the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Thus, it would suffice to consider the correctness of the impugned Government Orders passed, reiterating the earlier decisions to evict the encroachers from the Government land, allotted for construction of a Prison.
2. W.P.No.6989 of 2022 has been instituted, challenging G.O.Ms.No.84 (Revenue and Disaster Management Department Land Decisions NM 6-2 Division) dated 23.02.2022. W.P.No.6993 of 2022 has been filed, challenging the consequential Eviction Notice issued by the Tahsildar, Thanjavur dated 25.02.2022 in R.C.No.19205/2003/B5. Further directions are sought for to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on 20.09.2018 and on subsequent dates.
History of the Case:
3.1. The petitioners have encroached upon the Government land measuring about [12.70.50 Hectares (31.37 Acres)], situated in R.S.Nos.140, 141, 148 and others in Thirumalaisamuthiram Village, Thanjavur Taluk, Thanjavur District in the year 1985. The said Government land was allotted to the Prison Department of Government of Tamil Nadu for establishing an Open Air Jail. On account of encroachment made by the petitioner University, the Prison Department was unable to develop Open Air Jail in the allotted land.
3.2. Eviction proceedings had been initiated by the jurisdictional Tahsildar, Thanjavur under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act , 1905 (in short ‘Act, 1905’). Final Notice under Section 6 was issued, following the judgments delivered in W.P.Nos.14718 and 14719 of 1998 dated 13.07.1998. Opportunities were provided to the petitioner University for voluntary eviction of the superstructure made by the petitioner in Government lands. Challenging the notice issued under Section 6 of the Act, W.P.Nos.9287 and 9292 of 1999 were filed and the said Writ Petitions were dismissed, granting liberty to the petitioner University to file statutory appeals under Section 10 of the Act, 1905. Petitioner filed statutory appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Thanjavur on 28.06.1999, which was dismissed vide order dated 15.10.1999. The said order was taken by way of Review Petition before the District Revenue Officer, Thanjavur on 18.11.1999. The matter was remitted back to the Tahsildar, Thanjavur for fresh enquiry on 03.01.2000. After conducting due enquiry, the Tahsildar dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner University. Again, the petitioner University filed an appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Thanjavur, which was dismissed on 26.06.2000. Thereafter, the petitioner filed a Review Petition before the District Revenue Officer, Thanjavur, which was also dismissed on 26.12.2000 under the provisions of the Act, 1905.
3.3. A second review before the Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Administration, Chennai was filed and an interim order was passed. Meanwhile, the Writ Petitioner filed a petition to the Government for assignment of encroached land. Government rejected the request in its Letter dated 19.12.2002 and ordered for eviction of encroachments. Lease rent was also ordered to be collected for the period of encroachment. The Revision Petition filed before the Commissioner of Land Administration was dismissed on 01.03.2004.
3.4. Pertinently, beyond the statutory frame work, appeals, review after reviews were entertained and all the petitions were dismissed at various levels. Finally, challenging the order of the Commissioner of Land Administration,
Encroachers cannot claim rights over public lands designated for governmental purposes; repeated litigations on this issue are discouraged to prevent court congestion.
The High Court affirmed the necessity of evicting illegal encroachers from college land, emphasizing public interest and condemning procedural delays by the authorities.
Possession alone does not confer entitlement to government land; prior rejections of settlement applications by the state are binding.
The court held that lease conditions must be adhered to, and the Government has the authority to resume land for violations, reaffirming the classification of B-2 land under its management.
The court affirmed that eviction orders must comply with natural justice principles, ruling the eviction notice invalid as it lacked fair prior notice and disregarded existing proposals for land alie....
Encroachment on government land is a criminal trespass that necessitates prompt state action, emphasizing public trust in land management and the prioritization of communal rights over private claims....
The court emphasized the necessity for due process in determining land settlement requests, particularly when a private school has operated on disputed land for decades, balancing community education....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the State Government's authority to resume and hand over the land was justified, considering the University's agreement for exchange of land a....
Adverse possession claims over government land require substantial evidence; mere long-standing possession does not confer title, particularly where public interest is involved.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.