SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 291

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, J.
Eastern Karbi Anglong College – Petitioner 
Versus
The State Of Assam And Ors. Represented By The Commissioner And Secretary To The Government Of Assam, Revenue And Disaster Management Department - Respondent
WP(C)/1512 of 2023
Decided On : 05-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. S Mahanta, Mr. M Mahanta, Mr. A Chakraborty
For the Respondent: Ga, Assam, Sc, Higher Edu,Sc, Revenue,Ms. P R Mahanta,Sc, K A A C

The High Court affirmed the necessity of evicting illegal encroachers from college land, emphasizing public interest and condemning procedural delays by the authorities.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Extraordinary jurisdiction of High Court under Article 226 - Claim for eviction of illegal encroachers from land allotted to educational institution - School allotted 100 Bighas of land in 1998, with encroachment noticed from 2013, and steps taken for eviction - Procedural delays by respondents not justified. (Paras 3-22)

(B) Public interest - The writ petition emphasizes the importance of maintaining encroachment-free land for educational institutions. (Paras 13, 21)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner college received an allotment of land in 1998 for educational purposes. However, encroachments began appearing in 2013, leading to a petition for eviction after ineffective attempts by the authorities to remove the encroachers.

Findings of Court:
The court acknowledged the petition's validity and the importance of the land for public interest, ordering immediate steps for eviction.

Issues: The issues addressed include the delay in eviction processes and the conditions tied to the original land allotment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that despite procedural justifications offered by the respondents, there had been a conscious decision to undertake eviction that fell into abeyance without appropriate cause.

Result: Writ petition allowed, directing immediate action for eviction and reimbursement of deposited funds with interest.

Table of Content
1. relief sought for eviction of illegal encroachers (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. petitioner's bonafide efforts to address encroachment (Para 6 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. court's view on procedural delays and public interest (Para 8 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
4. arguments from respondents regarding delays and conditions (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. order to enforce eviction and reimbursement (Para 22 , 23)

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, J.

Heard Shri. M. Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri. N. Das, learned State counsel; Shri. J. Chutia, learned Standing Counsel, KAAC; Ms. G. Hazarika, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department and Ms. P.R. Mahanta, learned Standing Counsel, Higher Education Department.

2. It is a matter of astonishment that a college has to approach this Court invoking its extraordinary jurisdiction for making the land allotted to the same encroachment free. The relief claimed in this petition reads as follows :

i) A writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or any other writ, order or direction of like nature should not be issued directing the respondent authorities to take appropriate step(s) forthwith to evict the illegal encroachers from the land belongs to the petitioner college pursuant to the Order dated 12.06.2018 (Annexure - 13) issued by the respondent Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council and the subsequent Order dated 23.08.2018 (Annexure - 15) issued by the respondent Deputy Commissioner; AND/OR,

ii) A writ in the nature of Mandamus should not be issued directing the respondents to give effect and/or implement to the Order dated 23.08.2018 (Annexure - 15) issued by the respondent Deputy Commissioner forthwith and thereby, evict the illegal encroachers from the land belongs to the petitioner college without further delay; AND/OR,

iii) As to why any other appropriate writ, order or direction of similar nature should not be issued so as to give full relief to the petitioner; and upon cause or causes being shown and upon hearing the parties and on perusal of records, may be pleased to make the Rule absolute. Further, to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper and in accordance with law.

3. As per the facts projected, the petitioner is a provincialised college, which was established in the year 1997. The college was allotted 100 Bighas of land vide an order dated 26.03.1998 and the same was followed by handing over possession vide certificate dated 30.03.1998. It has been contended that in the year 2013, the college was provincialised and subsequently, approval was also granted to start the Science stream. The issue in this case which has been indicated above is with regard to the aspect of making the land encroachment free. The land in question contains of 2 (two) Dags, namely, Dag No.171 comprising of 70 Bighas and Dag No.286 comprising of 30 Bighas. When the Principal who was there in the year 2017 had noticed that no concrete steps were taken to remove the encroachment, the authorities in the Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council were approached which led to the Additional Deputy Commissioner to issue a communication dated 18.08.2017 to the Assistant Revenue Officer to take steps for removal of the encroachment.

4. The Revenue Department, KAAC vide communication dated December 2017, had approved the eviction process and on 27.12.2017, an estimate of the cost involved was also made which was Rs.1,41,900/- (Rupees One Lakh Forty- One Thousand Nine Hundred). The Revenue Department thereafter, issued a communication dated 15.03.2018 to the college stating that there was fund crunch and therefore, the estimated cost was to be arranged by the college which however, would be reimbursed. The said communication was reiterated by the Assistant Revenue Officer vide communication dated 17.03.2018, directing the college to deposit the amount. The amount mentioned above was accordingly deposited by the petitioner college vide cheque on 19.03.2018. The authorities had accordi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top