Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, R.SAKTHIVEL
D.Mohanraj Arumainayagam – Appellant
Versus
Jeyaratchakar C, Son of Chelladurai S – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellants elected in administrator-led election. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. appellants argue interim order's validity without hearing. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. challenges to administrator's authority and election process. (Para 5 , 19) |
| 4. interim orders may be considered judgments. (Para 7 , 10) |
| 5. right to a hearing before interim orders. (Para 12 , 22) |
| 6. court remands matter for proper hearing. (Para 16) |
| 7. final order remanding the matter for a hearing. (Para 23) |
JUDGMENT :
All these intracourt appeals have been filed by third parties who are said to have been elected as office bearers in various posts in the election conducted by the Administrator appointed by this Court in the previous legal proceedings. All the appellants herein have challenged the impugned order, dated 26.12.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge during the vacation sitting, restraining the Administrator from conducting the election on 13.12.2025, 30.12.2025 and 31.12.2025 and on any subsequent dates pursuant to the notice. This Court had granted leave on 09.01.2026 to file appeals by third parties on the ground that all the appellants were elected as office bearers in various capacities in the election conducted
A court must ensure that any interim orders affecting parties' rights are made only after providing an opportunity for all concerned parties to be heard, reinforcing the principle of fair hearing.
Elections must adhere to procedural compliance; improperly ratified amendments render elections invalid, reinforcing the necessity for integrity in electoral processes and governance.
The court upheld the Single Judge's decision, emphasizing the importance of judicial review in administrative actions and the need for civil courts to resolve disputes between factions in a registere....
The court dismissed the appeals against the interim injunction, stating that no final orders had been passed, and the interim injunction was based on sound discretion and was granted for a limited pe....
Point of law: the cases filed before the elections and after the elections. Almost 26 cases have been filed at the relevant point of time in 19 Courts, besides, various other interim orders have also....
The interim orders extending a Manager's tenure amid disputes regarding property status as Waqf were deemed improper, highlighting potential abuse of legal process.
A writ petition pursuing parallel remedies under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is impermissible and affects parties' rights; interim orders must determine substantial issues.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
