SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 691

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.N. Manjula, J.
Mr.Chiranjeevi Matcha - Applicant
Versus
R.V.Prasad S/o. Mr.G.Rangaraju – Respondent
A.Nos.342, 3095, 3096 & 3097 of 2025 in C.S.No.117 of 1973 A.No.342/2025
Decided On : 06-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. B. Ravi
For the Respondent: Mr. D. Nagasaila

Restatement of settled issues disallows reintroduction of previously excluded constituencies in Trust governance, maintaining judicial economy.

Headnote:(A) Section 92 of CPC - Trust - Applications challenging the maintainability of amendments to the Scheme of a Trust for appointment of trustees and audit - Court examines the previous litigations and maintains original Scheme excluding Old Boys from Board of Trustees, reinforcing that issues already settled cannot be revisited. (Paras 24, 28)

(B) Jurisdiction of the Court - The Court establishes that third-party applications regarding Trust administration must align with previous orders and that amendments respecting the Trust’s Scheme require thorough consideration of prior governance issues and present allegations of maladministration. (Paras 20, 22)

Facts of the case:
The applicant and several third parties filed applications regarding the maintainability of amendments to the Trust's Scheme for appointing trustees, with the applicant alleging mismanagement and advocating for the inclusion of Old Boys in governance.

Findings of Court:
The Court ruled that the applications to amend the Scheme were not maintainable due to prior adjudications that precluded revisiting settled issues regarding trustee composition.

Issues: Whether the applications to amend the Scheme of the Trust were maintainable under Section 92 of CPC in light of previously settled orders.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court determined that applications seeking to amend the Trust's Scheme cannot be allowed when earlier comprehensive decisions have been made, ensuring accountability and compliance with established governance structures.

Result: The applications in A.Nos.342 & 3097/2025 are allowed; A.Nos.6770/2024 & 2189/2025 are dismissed.

Table of Content
1. court's administrative procedure for managing trust disputes. (Para 6 , 7)
2. history and significance of the trust's governance changes. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
3. consequences of prior decisions on current applications. (Para 18 , 19)
4. judicial economy and finality in trust management. (Para 24 , 28)

ORDER :

R.N. Manjula, J.

A.No.342/2025 is filed to reject the application in A.No.6770/2024 in C.S.No.117 of 1973, as not maintainable.

A.No.3095/2025 is filed to reject the application in A.No.2187/2025 in C.S.No.117 of 1973, as not maintainable.

A.No.3096/2025 is filed to reject the application in A.No.2188/2025 in C.S.No.117 of 1973, as not maintainable.

A.No.3097/2025 is filed to reject the application in A.No.2189/2025 in C.S.No.117 of 1973, as not maintainable.

2. A third party who is the first respondent in A.No.342 of 2025 has filed an application in A.No.6770 of 2024 seeking the relief of amending the Scheme for composition of the Trust of Theagaraya Chetty Educational Institutions (hereinafter referred to as “the Trust) by including the Old Boys (Graduate Constituency) in the Trust. This application in A.No.342 of 2025 has been filed by the Managing Committee of the Trust challenging the maintainability of the very application in A.No.6770/2024.

3. An another third party applicant who is the first respondent in A.No.3096/2025 has filed an application in A.No.2188/2025 by seeking the amendment of the Scheme by inserting provisions for appointment of independent authority to ensure that the names and addresses of all the family members constituency of the Trust and communicate it to all the family members at the conclusion of each terms of such Trustees and for appointment of independent authority to oversee the nomination process for the selection of four family members in accordance with the Scheme and in the event of disagreement, to give power to the independent authority to conduct election among the eligible family members to select the family representatives and to increase the number of non-family Trustees from the existing 2 to at least 5 non-family Trustees (excluding ex-officio members), by appointing independent professionals such as Engineers, Lawyers, Bankers, Financial Experts, Economists, Entrepreneurs, Bureaucrats, Retired Judges and Industrialists as Trustees of the Trust.

4. The Secretary and Correspondent of the Trust has filed an Application in A.No.3096/2025 challenging the maintainability of the same. But the very same applicant has filed another application in A.No.2188/2025 seeking for the relief of appointment of independent Auditor to conduct a forensic audit of the finances and all assets, movable and immovable of the Theagaraya Chetty Educational Institutions, Management and impose a surcharge of any individuals found in misappropriation.

5. The Secretary and Correspondent of the Trust has filed an application in A.No.3095/2025 challenging the maintainability of the application filed in A.No.2187/2025. The very same third party applicant who is the first respondent in A.No.3097/2025 has filed an application in A.No.2189/2025 to direct the Tahsildar to restore the patta in respect of 5.6 grounds in R.S.No.1868/2018 to the name of the Thiyagaraya Chetty Institutions and Managing Committee. The Secretary and Correspondent of the Trust has filed an application in A.No.3097/2025 challenging the maintainability of the very same application.

6. Since all three applications have been filed by the applicant Trust with regard to the maintainability of three applications filed by the third parties seeking the relief of amending the Scheme and other reliefs, all these applications have been taken up together for hearing.

7. Heard Mr.B.Ravi, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.D.Nagasila, the learned counsel for R1.

8. Before adverting into the merits of these applications, a short background of the present Scheme under which the functions of the Trust is being carried out, needs to be given.

9.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top