IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, C.KUMARAPPAN, JJ.
A. Vamanan, President M/s. Bhaktavatsalam Educational Trust – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Kancheepuram – Respondent
W.P. Nos. 2413, 1416, 41488 of 2025, W.M.P. Nos. 1654, 2720 of 2025
Decided On : 07-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's determination to dismiss writ petitions based on established encroachment. (Para 1) |
| 2. background on land acquisition and exemption affecting present claims. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. discussions on due process in eviction notices and implications for future actions. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. final ruling on enforcement actions concerning encroached lands. (Para 20) |
ORDER :
1. W.P.No.1416 of 2025 has been instituted challenging the proceedings of the District Collector, Kancheepuram, dated 10.12.2024. W.P.No.2413 of 2025 is filed challenging the notice dated 24.12.2024 issued under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905.
2. Notice under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act was issued in pursuance to the proceedings of the District Collector, Kancheepuram dated 10.12.2024.
3. The facts in brief are that the petitioner Trust namely M/s. Bhaktavachalam Educational Trust submitted an application to the Government to acquire lands for establishing Polytechnic College to an extent of 73.43 acres in the year 1961. Acting on the representation submitted by the petitioner Trust, the Government issued notification for acquisition of 73.47 acres of land to be handed over to the petitioner Trust. However, an exemption notification was issued to exclude 19.3 acres in S.No.350/5, 354/4 & 5 and to be deleted from the acquisition proceedings in the year 1986. Accordingly, Gazette notification was made exempting 19.3 acres of lands from the Land Acquisition proceedings and the said Government poromboke lands are classified as “Thoppu Poramboke”. The balance acquired land to an extent of 54.13 acres was handed over to the petitioner Trust and they have established a Polytechnic College in a small portion of the land and running the Institution.
4. The authorities, during investigation, found that a portion of the Government land classified as “Thoppu Poramboke” was encroached upon by the petitioner Trust and a notice was issued by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kancheepuram, in proceedings dated 22.11.1993. The said notice would show that exemption notification issued in respect of 19.3 acres of land and the said land vests with the Government absolutely. The petitioner Trust was requested to explain as to why action should not be taken for eviction in respect of illegal possession in S.No.354/4 & 5 invoking the provisions of relevant Act.
5. The said eviction notice came to be challenged in W.P.No.6860/1994 by the petitioner Trust. The Trust made a request for transfer of land measuring 19.34 acres in W.P.No.9866/1998. The High Court directed the authorities to consider the request of the petitioner. The District Collector issued an order rejecting the request of the Trust. In respect of W.P.Nos.6860/1994, 9703/1997 and 3556/1999, a common order has been passed in all the writ petitions by the learned single Judge of this Court on 26.07.2022, stating that the petitioner Trust will take over an extent of 19.3 acres of “Thoppu Poramboke” on payment of land cost to be fixed on the basis of market value as on 26.12.1995. The Trust preferred W.A.Nos.474 to 476/2004 challenging the order passed by the learned single Judge in the writ petitions. The Division Bench of this Court dismissed the Writ Appeal on 11.04.2011 as under:
These writ appeals are filed against the order dated 26.7.2002 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.Nos.6860 of 1994, 9703 of 1997 and 3556 of 1999. 2. The order challenged in these writ appeals was passed on 26.7.2002 and the appeal papers were presented on 14.1.2003. When the above writ appeals were posted for admission on 30.3.2004, adjournment was sought for. From that date to till this date, neither the counsel nor the appellant has taken any steps to prosecute the matter or shown any interest to argue the case for admitting the writ appeals or obtaining interim stay of the order passed by the learned Single Judge at this belated point of time. Hence, the writ appeals are dis
Previously established rights of government over land exempted from acquisition supersede petitions claiming lack of opportunity in eviction proceedings.
When patta has been granted to a third party and an inter se dispute exists with pending statutory appeal, encroachment removal proceedings cannot proceed and parties must resolve issues through prop....
Eviction orders under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act must be accompanied by a reasoned explanation and proper verification of facts, failing which they are deemed invalid.
Eviction orders under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act must be reasoned and adhere to procedural fairness, requiring consideration of objections raised by the alleged encroacher.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.