IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.JAYACHANDRAN, MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, JJ.
Valliammal, S/o Late K.Krishnasamy Gounder, D/o Late Sellappa Gounder - Appellant
Versus
N.Lakshmi, W/o Late S.K.Natarajan, Behind Elementary School, Vijayapuram, Kangayam Road - Respondent
Appeal Suit No.814 of 2009, C.M.P.No.1480 of 2020
Decided On : 28-10-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. lawsuit relates to property inherited from nalli gounder. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. contentions regarding the mortgage and claims of the parties. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. trial court dismissed the claim for lack of proof. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 4. arguments on jurisprudence of partition suits and mortgage rights. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. distinction in rights regarding usufructuary mortgage clarified. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 6. appellants' claims dismissed, trial court judgment confirmed. (Para 32 , 33) |
JUDGMENT :
G.Jayachandran, J.
Judgment and decree dated 17.12.2008 passed in O.S.No.401 of 2005 challenged by the plaintiffs, on being aggrieved by its dismissal.
2. Gist of the plaint is as follows:-
Thiru.Nalli Gounder (late) had a vast extent of land including the suit property. On his death, the property devolved on his four sons namely Subbia Gounder, Palani Gounder, Arumuga Gounder and Vinayaga Gounder. On 01.03.1918, they entered into a partition deed in respect of the property left by their father, Nalli Gounder and got registered. Under the deed of partition, for their convenient sake, they divided the properties into “A” schedule and “B” schedule. The “A” Schedule consisting of 49.27 acres, jointly allotted to Subbia Gounder and Vinayaga Gounder. The “B” schedule consisting of 50.89 acres jointly allotted to Palani Gounder and Arumuga Gounder.
3. The “A” schedule consists of 28.09 acres of dry land and 21.18 acres of garden lands. Subbia Gounder and his sons sold away their half share in 21.18 acres of garden land and enjoying the ½ share in 28.09 acres of dry land. After the death of Subbia Gounder in the year 1938, the property devolved on the five sons of Subbia Gounder, who were in joint enjoyment of the half share in 28.09 acres of dry land and sharing the income. The dispute is in respect of ½ share in the dry land measuring 28.09 acres.
4. The further case of the plaintiffs is that, the suit property was administered by Subbia Gounder and his eldest son Sennimalai Gounder. His other two sons, by name, N.S.Kandasamy Gounder and N.S.Eswaramuthy Gounder, were carrying on tobacco business independently and contributing fund periodically for its improvement and sharing the income derived from the property. Yet, another son by name Sellappa Gounder is living in the nearby village used to frequently visit the property.
5. Subbia Gounder in the year 1938 leaving his five sons. His elder son Sennimalai Gounder died on 09.09.1974, leaving behind a son by name Kandasamy and two daughters. Kandasamy had four daughters and two sons. The first daughter of Sennimalai Gounder died unmarried. The Second daughter died leaving behind one son by name S.K.Natarajan. The said S.K.Natarajan was married to Lakshmi, the daughter of his maternal uncle Kandasamy, later, he died issueless leaving his widow Lakshmi as his sole legal heir.
6. Sellappan, the second son of Subbia Gounder, died on 27.08.1982 leaving behind three daughters and three sons.
7. N.S Kandasamy Gounder, the third son of Subbia Gounder died on 19.05.1975, leaving behind his wife, three sons and six daughters, N.S.Ramasamy, the fourth son of Subbia Gounder died on 18.11.1974, leaving behind his wife, five daughters and one son by name Jegannathan. His wife and son died later. His son died bachelor.
8. N.S.Eswaramurthy, the last son of Subbia Gounder, died on 11.10.1993 leaving behind his wife, four sons and five daughters.
9. According to the plaintiffs, Kandasamy, S/o Sennimalai Gounder died in the year 1988, till his death he along with his paternal uncle N.S.Eswaramurthy and the legal heirs of the other three sons of Subbia Gounder were jointly enjoying the suit property. Thus, each of the 5 branches of Subbia Gounder are entitled for 1/5th share in the suit property. When they sought for division of the suit property, the legal heirs of Kandasamy constituting one branch among the 5 branches, started claiming exclusive right are not ready for partition. Therefo
The right of redemption in usufructuary mortgages is not extinguished by time alone; however, failure to redeem within the stipulated period limits the mortgagor's rights, impacting partition claims.
Ouster among co-sharers requires hostile animus, long exclusive possession known to other co-owner; mere possession insufficient.
The court affirmed that daughters are entitled to equal shares in ancestral properties post-amendment, invalidating wrongful transactions made without their consent.
The amendment of co-parcenery rights retroactive effects and joint possession presumption prevent claims of ouster without substantial evidence.
A mortgage executed by a natural guardian without court permission is voidable against minors, and the limitation period for challenging such a mortgage is governed by Article 59 of the Limitation Ac....
In a partition suit, registered documents act as constructive notice, initiating the limitation period. Prolonged exclusive possession of ancestral property by a co-owner establishes ouster. Addition....
Properties claimed as self-acquired were determined to be ancestral; the appeal for partition was dismissed due to lack of joint possession evidence and non-joinder of necessary parties, also barred ....
A partition can be pursued despite unproven Wills, affirming joint possession while emphasizing the need for valid claims against co-owners.
The court affirmed that mere allegations of illegitimacy do not negate the plaintiffs' rights to inheritance, and the defendants failed to prove their claims of oral partition and sale.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.