P.Perumal (Died) vs Palanichamy - 2025 Supreme(Mad) 5570

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Mad) 5570

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VADAMALAI
P.Perumal (Died) – Appellant
Versus
Palanichamy – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. K. Balasundaram, Mr.R.Thangapandian
For the Respondent: Mr. H.Lakshmi Shankar

Table of Content
1. parties involved and nature of claim (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. claim of the plaintiffs and defendants (Para 5 , 6)
3. issues framed by trial court (Para 7 , 9)
4. second appeal process and additional evidence (Para 8 , 12 , 13 , 14)
5. first appellate court's findings (Para 10 , 11)
6. arguments from defendants' counsel (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
7. counterarguments from plaintiffs' counsel (Para 21 , 22)
8. final court ruling based on evidence review (Para 28 , 29)

JUDGMENT :

This Second Appeal is filed again the judgment and decree, dated 02.11.2012 passed in A.S.No.5 of 2011 by the Fa Track Court-cum-Additional Dirict Sessions Judge, Dindigul, reversing the judgment and decree dated 24.08.2010 passed in O.S.No.108 of 2007 on the file of the Sub Court, Palani.

2. The appellants are the defendants in O.S.No.108 of 2007 on the file of the Sub Court, Palani. The respondents are the plaintiffs in that suit.

3. The respondents/plaintiffs have filed the suit for partition, permanent injunction and to cancel the settlement deed, dated 23.07.1963, executed by Palanichamy in favour of 1 defendant as it is not legally valid.

4. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred as plaintiffs