Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, M.JOTHIRAMAN
G. Sampathkumar IPS, C/o. The Office of the Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai – Appellant
Versus
Mahendra Singh Dhoni – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the civil suit filed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's reasoning on the rejection of plaint. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT :
M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.
1. Unsuccessful 3rd defendant has preferred the Original Side Appeal against the order passed in A.No.4559 of 2021 in C.S.No.185 of 2014 dated 09.12.2021.
2. The 1st respondent/plaintiff Mahendra Singh Dhoni has filed a Civil Suit in C.S.No.185 of 2014 before this Court against Zee Media Corporation Limited (Zee News Channel)/1st defendant, M/s.Sudhir Chaudhary/2nd defendant, Mr.G.Sampath Kumar IPS/3rd defendant and M/s.News Nation Network Pvt. Ltd.,/4th defendant, seeking for the following reliefs:
(a) Permanent Injunction restraining the defendants 1 to 4, their associates, sister concerns, agents, representatives, correspondents, officers, employees and/or any other person entity, in print or electronic media or via internet or otherwise from publishing, republishing, carrying out any reports or articles or telecasts or repeat telecasts or programs or debates or any discussion or reporting or publishing in any other manner, any other matter of any kind directly or indirectly pertaining to the alleged report of the 3rd defendant or an
A plaint must disclose a cause of action to proceed in court, and mere claims of vagueness do not suffice for rejection, emphasizing the need for thorough examination of the allegations at trial.
A defamation suit must specify defamatory statements and their damaging nature; vague allegations do not establish a valid cause of action, warranting dismissal only if no triable issues arise.
A plaint must be rejected as a whole if it does not disclose a cause of action against any defendant; it cannot be partially rejected.
Defamation suit for libel time-barred beyond one year from publication; receipt of exoneration reports does not extend limitation. Plaint rejectable under Order VII Rule 11(d) if averments disclose l....
A suit for defamation is maintainable if it discloses a cause of action, and legal redress for reputational damage does not interfere with justice.
A cause of action for defamation requires publication of the alleged defamatory statements; mere issuance of a letter without public circulation does not suffice.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the power to reject a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC is to be exercised cautiously, and the test for determining whether a plaint d....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
