JUDGMENT

Tara Vitasta Ganju, J.

1. The present Appeal seeks to challenge the order dated 06.07.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in I.A. No. 10179/2021 in CS (OS) No. 251 of 2020 [hereinafter called "Impugned Order"]. By the Impugned Order, the Appellant/Defendant No.1's Application under Order VII Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as "CPC"] seeking rejection of the Plaint filed by the Appellant/Defendant No.1 [hereinafter for ease of reference referred to as "IIC"] was dismissed.

2. A suit for recovery of damages and compensation for wrongful termination of service by IIC was filed before the learned Single Judge by Respondent No.1/Plaintiff [hereinafter for ease of reference referred to as "HEMA"] who was employed with IIC for more than two decades was `forced to resign from her employment' and the forced resignation falls within the category of illegal termination. HEMA has, thus, prayed for a decree of recovery of damages for her dismissal from service and for interests and costs. The prayers made in the Plaint read:

"a) Pass a Judgment and Decree in favour of the Plaintiff for recovery of Rs.2,02,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crore and Two Lakh Only) a