SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 889

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VELMURUGAN,  K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, JJ.
M/s. Photon Factory Rep. By its Partner, Mr.Gautham Vasudev Menon – Appellant 
Versus
M/s. R.S.Infotainment (P) Ltd., Rep. By its Director, Mr.R.Jayaraman, S/o. Sri A.Ramanujam - Respondent 
O.S.A(CAD).No.65 of 2022
Decided on : 23-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr.A.Abdul Hameed, Senior Advocate for Ms.Anbarasi Rajendran of M/s.AAV Partners
For the Respondent: Mr.V.Anand for R1 Mr.Mohamed Farook

Breach of contract established as defendants failed to commence movie production, entitling plaintiff to recover funds advanced with interest.

Headnote:(A) Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - Section 13(1) - Breach of contract - Plaintiff entered into an agreement for movie production, paid an advance, yet defendants failed to produce the film leading to a claim of Rs.9,53,50,000/- with interest - High Court determined breach by defendants justified the claim - Findings included defendants’ non-compliance with production terms under the agreement. (Paras 4, 5, 21, 24)

Facts of the case:
The plaintiff engaged defendants to produce a film, paying significant funds, yet defendants did not fulfill their production obligations, leading to the plaintiff seeking recovery for losses incurred.

Findings of Court:
The court affirmed the breach of contract and upheld the claimed amount of Rs.4,25,00,000/- with interest as per the contractual terms, concluding defendants failed to produce the movie as agreed.

Issues: Primary issues included whether the plaintiff fulfilled payment obligations, whether defendants breached the contract, and the legitimacy of the plaintiff's claims against the defendants.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the defendants' failure to adhere to the contractual timeline resulted in the impossibility of the movie's production, justifying the plaintiff's claims for damages.

Result: Appeal dismissed; judgment of the lower court confirmed.

Table of Content
1. overview of plaintiff's claim and defendants' response. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. court's decision on the decree made by the single judge. (Para 7 , 8 , 13)
3. arguments presented by appellants regarding contract terms. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 16)
4. court's critical examination of evidential claims. (Para 15 , 17 , 18 , 19)
5. assessment of defendants' breach of contract and legal obligations. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)

JUDGMENT :

K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI,J.

1. The Original Side Appeal is filed challenging the order dated 05.04.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.S.No.153 of 2013.

2.The above suit was filed by the plaintiff seeking to pass a decree directing the Defendants 1, 3 & 4 to pay to Plaintiff a sum of Rs.9,53,50,000/-.

3.For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as arrayed in suit.

4.The sum and substance of the case of the Plaintiff is that, he entered into an Agreement dated 27.11.2008 with the 1st defendant, which is a partnership firm in which the 3rd and 4th Defendants are partners. No relief is claimed as against the 2nd defendant. Under the said Agreement, the Plaintiff engaged the services of the 1st defendant to produce a Tamil movie, which was described as production No.6 as it was un-titled. The Agreement provided that the 1st defendant should commence production of the movie on 10.12.2008 and complete the entire production of the first print before 05.04.2009. The Agreement further provided for the payment of a sum of Rs.13,50,00,000/- by the Plaintiff to the 1st defendant towards funding the cost of production as per the schedule set out in clause 2 thereof. In Clause 3, it was recorded that the Plaintiff had paid an advance amount of Rs.2,50,00,000/- which was acknowledged by the 1st defendant. In case, the 1st defendant did not complete the movie by the 1st week of April 2009, the Agreement provided for the payment of interest by the 1st defendant at the rate of 12% per annum on the entire sum of Rs.13,50,00,000/- until the date of completion and handing over of the first copy of the movie to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff was declared as the producer of the movie and the negative right holder. In terms of and pursuant to the Agreement, the Plaintiff paid the 1st defendant a sum of Rs.4,25,00,000/- in the aggregate, including the sum of Rs.2,50,00,000/- which was acknowledged therein. The receipt of the said sum in several tranches was acknowledged by the 1st defendant by counter signing, in acceptance letter dated 12.02.2010 from the Plaintiff to the defendant. According to the Plaintiff, the 1st defendant failed to commence the production of the movie. The further contention of the Plaintiff is that, the receipt of the sum of Rs.4,25,00,000/- was acknowledged by the Defendants. Inspite of receiving the said amount, the Defendants failed to proceed with the production of the movie. Therefore, the Defendants have committed breach of the Agreement. The Plaintiff before filing the present suit, preferred a suit in O.S.No.451 of 2013 before the 8th Assistant City Civil Court at Chennai seeking to prevent the Defendants 1, 3 & 4 from undertaking, commencing or releasing movies of third parties before completing the movies of the Plaintiff. Thereafter, the said suit was withdrawn by the Plaintiff with a leave to sue for damages by filing a separate suit. The Plaintiff has filed the present suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.9,53,50,000/- with interest at 24% per annum on the sum of Rs.4,25,00,000/-. It is further contended that the Plaintiff is entitled to default interest on the total sum of Rs.13,50,00,000/- for the period from 10.12.2003 to 05.04.2009. Hence, the Plaintiff claims a sum of Rs.9,53,50,000/-.

5.The claim of the Plaintiff was resisted by the Defendants stating that the Agreement provided that the Plaintiff should pay a sum of Rs.13,50,00,000/- as per the schedule set out in Clause 2 thereof. After paying the 1st installment of Rs.2,50,00,000/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top