Dayalan Rajes vs Vijayan Rajes - 2026 Supreme(Mad) 907

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Mad) 907

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, R.SAKTHIVEL
Dayalan Rajes – Appellant
Versus
Vijayan Rajes – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr.P.J.Rishikesh Mr.S.Parthasarathy, Senior counsel for Mr.S.Sethuraman Mr.Sharath Chandran for Mr.N.H.Rahamadullah
For the Respondents: Mr.Sharath Chandran for Mr.N.H.Rahamadullah for R-1 Mr.R.Baskar for R-3

Table of Content
1. appeals concerning common judgment in partition suits. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. factual background of family and property inheritance. (Para 6)
3. defendants' arguments on family arrangement validity. (Para 7 , 8)
4. plaintiffs' claims regarding family arrangement and partition. (Para 19 , 20)
5. court's considerations on family arrangement evidence. (Para 25 , 26 , 30)
6. considerations on the validity of the will. (Para 40 , 41)
7. final judgments on appeals and family arrangement status. (Para 49)

JUDGMENT :

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

1. A.S.Nos.772 and 1003 of 2005 have been preferred against a common judgment made in O.S.Nos.74 and 73 of 2004 dated 31.12.2004 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.2, Salem. A.S.No.772 of 2005 has been preferred by the plaintiffs in O.S.No.74 of 2004 which was dismissed by the trial court. A.S.No.1003 of 2005 has been filed by the plaintiff in O.S.No.73 of 2004 which was also dismissed by the trial court by the aforesaid common judgment dated 31.12.2004.

2.A.S.No.856 of 2025 has been preferred by the plaintiff in O.S.No.116 of 2004 which was also dismissed by the trial court by a judgment and decree dated 24.03.2