Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T.ASHA
B. Hilda Mercy – Appellant
Versus
Director of School Education, Chennai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges rejection of appointment due to lack of tet qualification. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. minority institutions are exempt from the mandatory tet requirement under constitutional provisions. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER :
1. This Writ Petition has been filed for the following reliefs:
“call for the records relating to the proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent by proceeding Mo. Mu. No.3898/Aa4/2025 dated November, 2025 signed on 05.11.2025 and to quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to approve the appointment of the petitioner in the Post of B.T. Assistant (Mathematics) in the 4th respondent school, from the date of appointment on 01.08.2023 with all consequential and attendant benefits including the payment of salary from the date of appointment along with interest within a time frame to be fixed by this Honourable Court.”
2. The petitioner was appointed as a BT Assistant (Mathematics) in the 4th respondent School by proceedings dated 30.07.2023 with effect from 01.08.2023. Accordingly, the petitioner joined the service in the post of the BT Assistant (Mathematics). The 4th respondent school submitted a proposal to the 3rd respondent for approval
The Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) is not a mandatory requirement for the appointment of teachers in minority educational institutions, as such requirements under RTE regulations cannot infringe upon....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
