SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 1468

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.
Dr. R. Srikumar – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department – Respondent
W.P. No.16405 of 2015
Decided On : 10-04-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. M.R. Jothimanian.
For the Respondents: M/s. Indhubala, AGP, Mr. D. Ravichander, Mr. A.E. Ravi Chandran.

Postgraduate training not equivalent to formal teaching experience; erroneous marks for unpossessed qualification arbitrary; expert selection upheld absent perversity.

Headnote:The recruitment notification for Assistant Professor in Microbiology required a postgraduate degree and not less than three years of teaching/research experience, recognizing Ph.D. in related interdisciplinary subjects. Petitioner possessed requisite qualifications including Ph.D. and extensive experience, while respondent 3 lacked mandatory experience and was erroneously awarded marks for non-existent Ph.D., and respondent 4's private research experience was accepted by the expert committee. Court found selection process arbitrary for respondent 3 but upheld respondent 4's appointment. Issues framed included eligibility compliance, equivalence of postgraduate training experience, validity of private research experience, and mark allocation fairness. Ratio decidendi emphasized that postgraduate teaching participation does not substitute formal three-year experience in recognized institutions; award of marks for unpossessed qualifications is arbitrary; expert committee decisions not to be interfered absent perversity; interdisciplinary Ph.D. like Physiology qualifies for Microbiology. Writ petition disposed directing University to accommodate petitioner in vacant or supernumerary post of Assistant Professor (Microbiology) with benefits from respondent 3's appointment date, within two months.

JUDGMENT :

HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.

This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of declaration to declare the appointments of respondents 3 and 4 as Assistant Professors in Microbiology, pursuant to the order dated 19.05.2014 passed by the second respondent, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the recruitment notification, and consequently to direct the second respondent to appoint the petitioner as Assistant Professor in Microbiology in the second respondent-University.

2. The second respondent issued a recruitment notification inviting applications from eligible candidates for appointment to the post of Assistant Professor in Microbiology, among other disciplines. The petitioner, as well as respondents 3 and 4, claiming to be fully qualified and eligible, submitted their applications. The petitioner applied under both General Turn and MBC category. All the candidates participated in the selection process and appeared before the duly constituted Selection Committee. Upon completion of the selection process, respondents 3 and 4 were selected and appointed. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has approached this Court.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the selection process is vitiated by arbitrariness and non-adherence to the prescribed eligibility criteria. It is specifically contended that the third respondent did not possess the mandatory three years of teaching/research experience in a recognised medical college, which is a sine qua non for appointment to the said post. It is further contended that marks were erroneously awarded to the third respondent towards Ph.D. qualification, despite the admitted position that she did not possess a Ph.D. degree.

4. Insofar as the fourth respondent is concerned, the learned counsel would submit that the research experience claimed by him in a private software company cannot be equated with research experience contemplated under the recruitment notification. It is therefore contended that both respondents 3 and 4 were ineligible and that the petitioner, who possessed all requisite qualifications and superior cre-dentials, has been unjustly denied appointment.

5. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for respondents 2 and 3 would submit that the third respondent possessed sufficient teaching and research experience, including the experience gained during her M.D. course. Placing reliance on Clause 13.6 of the Medical Council of India Regulations, it is contended that postgraduate students are required to participate in teaching undergraduate students and interns and such experience ought to be taken into account. It is further submitted that the marks were awarded strictly in accordance with the recruitment notification and that in the absence of specific allegations of mala fides, the same cannot be interfered with in exercise of writ jurisdiction. It is also contended that the fourth respondent possessed more than the requisite research experience.

6. This Court has carefully considered the rival submissions and perused the entire materials placed on record. Despite service of notice, the fourth respondent has not entered appearance.

7. The qualification prescribed in the recruitment notification for the post of Assistant Professor in Microbiology is as follows:

MICROBIOLOGY DISCIPLINE

(i) A first or second class post-graduate degree with State/ UGC/CSIR/National Level Screening Test qualification or Ph.D. in Microbiology/related interdisciplinary subject with not less than three years of teaching research experience. (ii) Besides the above, candidates with a Post-graduate Degree in Microbiology in Medical, Veterinary and other professional faculties in the concerned subject with not less than three years of teaching/re-search experience are also eligible.

8. The qualifications prescribed under the recruitment notification for the post of Assistant Professor in Microbiology require a postgraduate degree in the relevant discipline, along with not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top