IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. DHANDAPANI, J.
Sumaiya Fathima S. – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
W.P. Nos. 13536, 13571 of 2026, W.M.P. Nos. 14790, 14792, 14793, 14840, 14841, 14842 of 2026
Decided On : 15-04-2026
ORDER :
1. By consent of both parties, these writ petitions are taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners in respect of WP.No.13536 of 2026 filed withdrawal letters of petitioners 3, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10 and the same is taken on record. Accordingly, the writ petition in WP.No.13536 of 2026 stands dismissed as withdrawn with respect to the petitioners 3, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10. Similarly, learned counsel for the petitioners with regard to WP.No.13571 of 2026 has filed withdrawal letters of petitioners 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 17 & 20 and the same is taken on record. Accordingly, the writ petition in WP.No.13571 of 2026 stands dismissed as withdrawn with respect to the petitioners 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 17 & 20.
3. WMP.Nos.14790 of 2026 &14840 of 2026 have been filed to permit the respective petitioners to file single writ petition. These petitions are ordered on payment of separate court fee.
4. These petitions have been filed directing the Respondents 1 and 2 to direct the respondents 3 to 9 and 3 to 12 respectively to return the (1) Original 12th Mark Sheet (2) Original UG Mark sheets (3) Original UG Degree Certificate (4)Original PG Provisional, (5) Original PG Mark Sheets, (6) Original PG Degree Certificate, (7) Original 10th Certificate and all other original documents deposited by respective petitioners retained by the Respondents 3 to 9 and 3 to 12 respectively regarding the Post-Graduation Courses of the petitioner respectively.
5. The case of the petitioners is that, they are qualified Doctors and had pursued Post Graduate Degree (in short P.G.) in the respondents 3 to 9 and 3 to 12 respectively. At the time of admission, the petitioners were directed to submit their original documents and certificates to the respective respondents colleges as a compulsory pre-condition to secure admission in the said colleges. In addition, the petitioners, being non-service candidates, were also required to sign a bond for a sum of Rs.40,00,000/- with the undertaking that they would serve the Government of Tamil Nadu for a period not less than two years. Though the petitioners had completed the course in the month of November 2025, till date, they have neither been granted bond postings nor have their original documents submitted, at the time of admission, been returned. Hence, the petitioners have come up with the present Writ Petition.
6. The learned counsel appearing for the respective petitioners submitted that though the petitioners have successfully completed their P.G course during November 2025, they were neither provided with bond postings nor were their original certificates and documents collected during the time of admission to the P.G. course returned which is wholly unsustainable. Therefore, retention of the certificates and documents of the petitioners by the respondents and restraining the certificates from acquiring job in private sector is not sustainable and therefore submitted that it would suffice, if this Court issues direction to the respondents 3-9 and 3 to 12 respectively to return the original certificates and documents of the petitioners, enabling them to obtain job in any of the private sector.
7. The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents, on instructions, submitted that, as per the Prospectus, the petitioners are directed to serve the Government of Tamil Nadu for a period of two years from the date of completion of their PG course and that their Certificates will be released only after successful completion of the bond period of two years.
8. Heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel on either side.
9. Having regard to the submissions advanced by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioners having completed their P.G. Course even as early as during the month of November 2025, retaining the original certificates/ documents submitted by the petitioners at the time of admission to the respe
Retention of original documents post-PG completion without bond postings is unsustainable; courts direct posting or document release.
Retention of original certificates by government bodies is unlawful without due process, particularly after course completion.
Court directs posting orders post-PG completion or return of original documents if bond service not initiated.
Court directs posting orders or release of original documents if bond service obligation unmet post-course completion.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's use of mandamus to compel the respondents to return the original documents submitted by the petitioners, with an undertaking from the p....
Candidates are entitled to retrieve their certificates upon completion of two years unless employment was offered, supporting the bond conditions.
The bond period is co-terminus with the period of two years from the date a candidate successfully passes out the course, and appointment should be given within this period.
The period of applicability of the bond conditions will be co-terminus with the period of two years from the date a candidate successfully passes out the course.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.