SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Mad) 2085

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS 
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. 
S.Loganadhan - Petitioners 
Versus
The Director General of Police (DGP), - Respondent
WP Crl. No. 268 of 2026 
Decided On : 12-02-2026 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Ms.R.A.Shimsha For Mr.K.Natesh Pandi
For the Respondents: Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER :

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

This Writ Petition (Criminal) has been filed seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to initiate suitable proceedings and take appropriate action against the respondents 3 and 4 under Section 4(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, for wilful neglect of duties. The petitioner further seeks a direction to the 3rd respondent to conduct a proper inquiry into the petitioner’s complaint dated 19.12.2025, which was forwarded by the 2nd respondent vide proceedings H2/2837/15279/2025 and to proceed further in accordance with the provisions of the SC/ST (PoA) Act.

2. The case of the petitioner is that he belongs to the Schedule Caste community. On 18.12.2025, when the petitioner along with his friend were going to his land, they were assaulted and abused by one Venkatachalam belonging to the another caste of Hindu community and he also unlawfully blocked the Government public road in S.No.217/1 by erecting a wire fence, thereby preventing the petitioner from accessing his property. The petitioner gave a complaint to the Superintendent of Police, Namakkal District, on 19.12.2025, which was subsequently forwarded to the respondents 3 and 4 vide communication No.H2/2837/15279/2025. The petitioner was called for an inquiry by the 4th respondent on 26.12.2025. However, the petitioner contended that despite specific allegations of caste-based abuse, the respondents have not taken any steps till date and hence, the present writ petition has been filed.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 submitted that a preliminary inquiry was conducted by the respondent-Police and it was found that there is a property dispute pending between the petitioner and their counter-parties. He would further submit that the inquiry is pending and appropriate action will be taken in accordance with law and the report will be filed within two weeks. He would further submit that the respondents 3 and 4 are shown in their individual capacity and that they are officers attached to Puthusathiram Police Station and a direction may be issued to them in their official capacity.

4. In view of the above submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the Inspector of Police, Puthusathiram Police Station, Namakkal District is directed to complete the inquiry proceedings and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. This Writ Petition stands disposed of on the above terms. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top