SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Ori) 190

B.N.MISRA
SECY. , GOVT. OF ORISSA, IRRIGATION DEPT. – Appellant
Versus
RAGHUNATH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Y.DAS

B. N. MISRA, J.


( 1 ) THIS appeal under S. 39 (1) (vi) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is directed against the judgment dt. 4-10-82 of the learned Subordinate Judge, Nayagarh in O. S. No. 18 of 1982 (Arbitration ).

( 2 ) THE respondent is a contractor. Appellant No. 3 had entrusted him with the execution of "construction of Panipoila MIP" under agreement No. 187-F-2 of 1971-72. Disputes arose between the parties and as appellant No. 2 failed to appoint an arbitrator as per Cl. 23 of the agreement, the respondent moved the court for appointment of an arbitrator under S. 8 (2) of the Act. The application was registered as Misc. Case No. 8 of 1980 and after hearing the parties the learned Subordinate Judge by order dt. 18-11-80 read with order dt. 15-12-80 appointed Shri Prafulla Chandra De, Retired District and Sessions Judge, as the Arbitrator to decide the disputes between the parties. The respondent filed a statement of claims and the appellants filed counter before the learned Arbitrator who heard the parties and finally on 15-5-82 made an award of Rs. 19,57,775/- (Rupees Nineteen Lakhs Fiftyseven Thousand Seven Hundred and Seventyfive only) i







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top