HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
PRADIP MOHANTY AND BISWAJIT MOHANTY, JJ.
Odisha Public Service Commission - Petitioner
Versus
Priyambada Das and others - Opposite Parties
W.P(C) No.16601 of 2014
Decided On : 16 .01.2015
2. ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT, 1985 - Sec. 22 - Learned Tribunal while disposing of a case or adjudicating a matter has to be guided by principles of natural justice - In the present case the selected candidates, 5823 in number, have been condemned unheard by setting aside their selection in their absence - Selected candidates are necessary parties and the learned Tribunal has gone wrong in disposing of the matter without insisting on their presence in tune with the principles of natural justice. (Para - 29)
3. ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT, 1985 - Sec. 5(6) - Matter relating to the recruitment is a Division Bench matter - A Single Bench can only take up such matters, which have been assigned to it by the Hon’ble Chairman - In the present case the matter relating to recruitment was never assigned to the Single Member Bench by the Hon’ble Chairman - Order passed by the learned Single Member Bench is wholly without jurisdiction. (Para - 30)
JUDGMENT :
Biswajit Mohanty, J.
This writ application has been filed by the petitioner-Odisha Public Service Commission, for short, “the OPSC” with a prayer to quash the order dated 26.8.2014 passed by the Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in O.A. No.2146(C) of 2014 under Annexure-5.
2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts of the case are as follows;
On 17.11.2011, Advertisement No.5 of 2011-12 was issued by the OPSC inviting applications in prescribed Short Form from the candidates for admission to the Odisha Civil Services Preliminary Examination, 2011 for recruitment to the Posts and Services coming under Odisha Civil Services (Category-I & Category-II) as mentioned therein. In the said advertisement, it was made clear that the Examination should be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Odisha Civil Services (Combined Competitive Recruitment Examination) Rules, 1991, for short, “1991 Rules”. It was made clear that the relevant portion of the said Rules was available in the website of the Commission. At Paragraph-15, advertisement also referred to the Website of the Commission and informed the candidates to visit the Website of the Commission for detailed information about programme of examinations, etc. On 16.12.2011, a corrigendum to the above noted advertisement was issued revising the number of vacancies. On 22.2.2012, vide Notice No.1138/P.S.C., the petitioner informed all concerned that it (OPSC) had decided to implement a uniform Negative Marking System in all competitive examinations having objective type (multiple choice) questions where Answer Sheets were to be evaluated through Computer (O.M.R. System). On 19.1.2014, the Preliminary Examination was conducted. On 18.2.2014, vide Notice No.779/P.S.C., the petitioner published model answers to question papers in the Website of OPSC inviting observations/comments from candidates/general public online by 28.2.2014. On 1.5.2014, the petitioner published correct model answers in respect of the subjects in which observations/comments were received. It also published the procedure for valuation of answer sheets in the Website of the Commission. On the same date, i.e., 1.5.2014 vide Notice No.1838/PSC, the petitioner published the results of Preliminary Examination. The said notice made it clear that 5823 candidates have been provisionally qualified/selected for admission to Odisha Civil Services (Main) Examination and roll numbers of these candidates were available in the Website of the OPSC. It also made clear that the selected candidates were required to furnish the applications online through proforma application form for the Main Examination. Vide Notice No.2052/P.S.C. dated 14.5.2014, it was notified by the petitioner that online applications for applying to sit in the Odisha Civil Services Examination, 2011 would be available till 20.6.2014. The last date for receipt of print-out/hard-copy of online applications along with copy of specified documents/ certificate was on 30.6.2014. It was also made clear that the petitioner had decided to conduct the Odisha Civil Services Main Examination during September, 2014. Vide Notice No.3349/P.S.C. dated 4.7.2014, the petitioner, in consideration of difficulties faced by some candidates in remote rural areas extended the last date for submission online application form for admission to Odisha Civil Services Examination, 2011. Vide Notice No.3605/P.S.C. dated 10.7.2014, the petitioner notified that it was going to conduct the Odisha Civil Services Examination (Main Examination), 2011 from 6.9.2014 to 30.9.2014 at five zones of the State.
3. It is at this juncture on 30.7.2014, one Priyambada Das (opposite party no.1) filed O.A. No.2146(C) of 2014 before the learned Tribunal with prayer that the learned Tribunal should set aside the grace marks awarded by the OPSC in the Preliminary Examination and accordingly, set aside the results of Preliminary Examination and OPSC be directed to publish the
B.L. Sreedhar and others v. K. M. Munireddy and others
H.C. Kulwant Singh and others v. H.C. Daya Ram and others
Sadananda Halo v. Momtaz Ali Sheikh
R. Sulochana Devi v. D.M. Sujatha and others
Rajesh Kumar and others, etc. v. State of Bihar and others
Suresh v. Yeotmal District Central Co-operative Bank Limited and another
B. Prabhakar Rao and others v. State of Andhra Pradesh and others
Pankaj Sharma v. State of Jammu and Kashmir and others
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research and another v. A. P. Wasan and others
A. Janardhana v. Union of India and others
The General Manager, South Central Railway, Secunderabad and another v. A.V.R. Siddhanti and others
Guru Nanak Dev University v. Saumil Garg and others
Gadde Venkateswara Rao v. Government of Andhra Pradesh and others
Maharaja Chintamani Saran Nath Shahdeo v. State of Bihar and others
Chandra Singh v. State of Rajasthan and another
State of Uttaranchal through Collector, Dehradun and others v. Ajit Singh Bhola and another
Manish Ujwal and others v. Maharish Dayananda Saraswati University and others
Udit Narayan Singh Malpaharia v. Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar and another
Narmada Bachao Andolan v. State of Madhya Pradesh and another
Shankarsan Dash v. Union of India
Union Carbide Corporation etc. v. Union of India etc.
Mysore Urban Development Authority v. Veer Kumar Jain and others
Jayendra Vishnu Thakur v. State of Maharashtra and another
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and another v. Bal Mukund Bairwa(2) (2009) 4 SCC 299
All India SC & ST Employees’ Association and another v. A. Arthur Jeen and others
Prabodh Verma and others v. State of Uttar Pradesh and others
Public Service Commission, Uttaranchal v. Mamta Bisht and others
J.S. Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh and another
Dr. Mahabal Ram v. Indian Council of Agricultural Research and others
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.