SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ori) 20

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
PRADIP MOHANTY AND BISWAJIT MOHANTY, JJ.
Odisha Public Service Commission - Petitioner
Versus
Priyambada Das and others - Opposite Parties
W.P(C) No.16601 of 2014
Decided On : 16 .01.2015

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Petitioner:Mr. Rajat Kumar Rath, Senior Advocate
M/s. Pradipta Kumar Mohanty, D.N. Mohapatra, J. Mohanty, P.K. Nayak, S.N. Dash & A. Das
For Opp. Parties : M/s. Dr. Ashok Kumar Mohapatra, Alok Kumar Mohapatra, Asit Kumar Dash, B. Panda, S. Mohapatra, S.P. Mangaraj, S. Mohanty, T. Dash, S. Samal & S.K. Barik (for opposite party no.1)
Mr. S. P. Mishra, learned Advocate General (for opposite party no.2)
M/s. Himansu Sekhar Mishra, A.K. Mishra, A. K. Tripathy & K. Badhi [for opposite party nos.4 & 5 (interveners)]
M/s. B.B. Mohanty, M.R. Harichandran, Bikash Tripathy & B. Samantary [for opposite party no.7 (interveners)]
M/s. J. Patnaik, Senior Advocate, B. Mohanty, S. Patnaik, R.P. Ray, B.S. Rayguru & S. Pholgu [for opposite party nos. 8 & 9 (interveners)]
M/s. S.K. Padhi, Senior Advocate, S. Das & K. Mohanty [for opposite party no.10(interveners)]
M/s. Dhuliram Pattanayak, N. S. Panda, N. Biswal & L. pattanayak [for opposite party no.11(interveners)]
M/s. Sameer Kumar Das, S. K. Mishra & P. K. Behera [for opposite party nos.12 to 22(interveners)]
M/s. B. Routary, Senior Advocate S. K. Samal & R. P. Dalei [for opposite party nos.23 to 24(interveners)]

Headnote:1. ORISSA CIVIL SERVICES (COMBINED COMPETITIVE RECRUITMENT EXAMINATION) RULES, 1991 - Rule 12(1) read with Clause II of Schedule II of 1991 Rules - Odisha Civil Services Preliminary Examination, 2011 - Candidates qualifying the Preliminary Examination shall only be called by the commission to appear in the Main Examination -. Candidates also qualified in the Preliminary Examination got the right to appear in the Main Examination - Selected 5823 successful candidates have a right to appear in the main examination as per 1991 Rules, which is a rule made under proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India - In the present case since the select list containing Roll Nos. of 5823 successful candidates has been set aside by the learned Tribunal, it clearly offers their right to sit in the main examination. (Para - 25)

       2. ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT, 1985 - Sec. 22 - Learned Tribunal while disposing of a case or adjudicating a matter has to be guided by principles of natural justice - In the present case the selected candidates, 5823 in number, have been condemned unheard by setting aside their selection in their absence - Selected candidates are necessary parties and the learned Tribunal has gone wrong in disposing of the matter without insisting on their presence in tune with the principles of natural justice. (Para - 29)

       3. ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT, 1985 - Sec. 5(6) - Matter relating to the recruitment is a Division Bench matter - A Single Bench can only take up such matters, which have been assigned to it by the Hon’ble Chairman - In the present case the matter relating to recruitment was never assigned to the Single Member Bench by the Hon’ble Chairman - Order passed by the learned Single Member Bench is wholly without jurisdiction. (Para - 30)

JUDGMENT :

Biswajit Mohanty, J.

This writ application has been filed by the petitioner-Odisha Public Service Commission, for short, “the OPSC” with a prayer to quash the order dated 26.8.2014 passed by the Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in O.A. No.2146(C) of 2014 under Annexure-5.

2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts of the case are as follows;

On 17.11.2011, Advertisement No.5 of 2011-12 was issued by the OPSC inviting applications in prescribed Short Form from the candidates for admission to the Odisha Civil Services Preliminary Examination, 2011 for recruitment to the Posts and Services coming under Odisha Civil Services (Category-I & Category-II) as mentioned therein. In the said advertisement, it was made clear that the Examination should be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Odisha Civil Services (Combined Competitive Recruitment Examination) Rules, 1991, for short, “1991 Rules”. It was made clear that the relevant portion of the said Rules was available in the website of the Commission. At Paragraph-15, advertisement also referred to the Website of the Commission and informed the candidates to visit the Website of the Commission for detailed information about programme of examinations, etc. On 16.12.2011, a corrigendum to the above noted advertisement was issued revising the number of vacancies. On 22.2.2012, vide Notice No.1138/P.S.C., the petitioner informed all concerned that it (OPSC) had decided to implement a uniform Negative Marking System in all competitive examinations having objective type (multiple choice) questions where Answer Sheets were to be evaluated through Computer (O.M.R. System). On 19.1.2014, the Preliminary Examination was conducted. On 18.2.2014, vide Notice No.779/P.S.C., the petitioner published model answers to question papers in the Website of OPSC inviting observations/comments from candidates/general public online by 28.2.2014. On 1.5.2014, the petitioner published correct model answers in respect of the subjects in which observations/comments were received. It also published the procedure for valuation of answer sheets in the Website of the Commission. On the same date, i.e., 1.5.2014 vide Notice No.1838/PSC, the petitioner published the results of Preliminary Examination. The said notice made it clear that 5823 candidates have been provisionally qualified/selected for admission to Odisha Civil Services (Main) Examination and roll numbers of these candidates were available in the Website of the OPSC. It also made clear that the selected candidates were required to furnish the applications online through proforma application form for the Main Examination. Vide Notice No.2052/P.S.C. dated 14.5.2014, it was notified by the petitioner that online applications for applying to sit in the Odisha Civil Services Examination, 2011 would be available till 20.6.2014. The last date for receipt of print-out/hard-copy of online applications along with copy of specified documents/ certificate was on 30.6.2014. It was also made clear that the petitioner had decided to conduct the Odisha Civil Services Main Examination during September, 2014. Vide Notice No.3349/P.S.C. dated 4.7.2014, the petitioner, in consideration of difficulties faced by some candidates in remote rural areas extended the last date for submission online application form for admission to Odisha Civil Services Examination, 2011. Vide Notice No.3605/P.S.C. dated 10.7.2014, the petitioner notified that it was going to conduct the Odisha Civil Services Examination (Main Examination), 2011 from 6.9.2014 to 30.9.2014 at five zones of the State.

3. It is at this juncture on 30.7.2014, one Priyambada Das (opposite party no.1) filed O.A. No.2146(C) of 2014 before the learned Tribunal with prayer that the learned Tribunal should set aside the grace marks awarded by the OPSC in the Preliminary Examination and accordingly, set aside the results of Preliminary Examination and OPSC be directed to publish the









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top