JUDGMENT:

B.R. Sarangi, J.

The petitioner, by means of this writ application, craves the following reliefs:

"(i) why the Opp.parties shall not be directed to drop the disciplinary proceeding which was initiated against the petitioner in the year 1994;

AND

(ii) why the Opp.Parties shall not be directed to fix the scale of pay of the petitioner as per ORSP Rules 1998 and 2008 respectively within stipulated period;

AND

(iii) why the Opposite Parties shall not be directed to provide annual increments right from 1994 in favour of the petitioner by regularizing his service;

AND

(iv) Why the Opp.Parties shall not be directed to calculate the arrear differential salary of the petitioner and to release the same in his favour within stipulate period;

AND

(v) why the opp.parties shall not be directed to release the post retiral benefits of the petitioner in his favour within stipulated period;

AND

(vi) Why the Opp.Parties shall not be directed to take steps for sanction of pension in favour of the petitioner within stipulated period;

And if the Opp.Parties do not show cause or show insufficient cause then the rule be made absolute by issuing appropriate writ or writs/direction or directions and any other o