SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 31

A. K. MOHAPATRA
Maheswar Barik – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S.K. Mohanty, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. S.K. Nayak, Additional Government Advocate, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Video Conferencing/Physical Mode).

2. Being aggrieved by rejection of their respective bail applications and consequent restriction imposed on the personal liberty of the petitioners by a common rejection order dtd. 2.08.2021 passed by the 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar in C.T. Case No.3524 of 2021, the above noted bail applications have been filed by the above named accused petitioners. Since the facts involved are similar which arises out of a common FIR, all the above noted Bail Applications were heard together and is being disposed by the following common order.

3. In the above noted Bail Applications, the accused-Petitioners are in custody since 28.06.2021 in connection C.T. Case No.3524 of 2021 arising out of Sahid Nagar P.S. Case No.258 dated 28.06.2021 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 419/420/465/467/468/471/120-B, I.P.C. and Sections 66-C/66-D of the Information Technology Act.

4. The prosecution case, in a nutshell, is that the Inspector of Police, namely, Jatindra Nath Sethy Cyber Cell, Bhubaneswar while investigating Sahid Nagar P.S. Case No.21 dated 11.01.2021, registered under Sectio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top