A. K. MOHAPATRA
Maheswar Barik – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent
ORDER
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Video Conferencing/Physical Mode).
2. Being aggrieved by rejection of their respective bail applications and consequent restriction imposed on the personal liberty of the petitioners by a common rejection order dtd. 2.08.2021 passed by the 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar in C.T. Case No.3524 of 2021, the above noted bail applications have been filed by the above named accused petitioners. Since the facts involved are similar which arises out of a common FIR, all the above noted Bail Applications were heard together and is being disposed by the following common order.
3. In the above noted Bail Applications, the accused-Petitioners are in custody since 28.06.2021 in connection C.T. Case No.3524 of 2021 arising out of Sahid Nagar P.S. Case No.258 dated 28.06.2021 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 419/420/465/467/468/471/120-B, I.P.C. and Sections 66-C/66-D of the Information Technology Act.
4. The prosecution case, in a nutshell, is that the Inspector of Police, namely, Jatindra Nath Sethy Cyber Cell, Bhubaneswar while investigating Sahid Nagar P.S. Case No.21 dated 11.01.2021, registered under Sectio
Prasanta Kumar Sarkar vs. Ashis Chatterjee : (2010) 14 SCC 496
Ram Govind Upadhyay vs. Sudarshan Singh : (2002) 3 SCC 598
Sanjay Chandra vs. CBI : (2012) 1 SCC 40
State of Kerala vs. Raneef : reported in (2011) 1 SCC 784
State of Rajasthan vs. Balchand : reported in (1977) 4 SCC 308
State of UP vs. Amarmani Tripathi : (2005) 8 SCC 21
Arnab Manoranjan Goswami vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. : reported in (2021) 2 SCC 427
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.