IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Jasjit Singh Bedi, J.
Maninder Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Tax Officer, State Tax, Mobile Wing, Jalandhar, Punjab – Respondent
CRM-M-24033-2021(O&M), CRM-M-32902-2021, CRM-M-32903-2021 and CRM-M-36121-2021(O&M)
Decided On : 31-08-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fraudulent tax evasion through fake firms. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claims for bail based on legal technicalities. (Para 3) |
| 3. evaluation of bail considerations and evidence. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
Jasjit Singh Bedi, J. (Oral) - This order shall dispose of four bail petitions filed under Section 439 Cr.PC for grant of regular bail in Complaint No.15 of 2021 titled as State Versus Vinod Kumar & Ors. Registered on 12.05.2021 under Sections 132 (1) (a), (b) & (c) of Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and Punjab Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 by Maninder Sharma bearing CRM-M-24033-2021, Vinod Kumar bearing CRM-M-329022021, Sunny Mehta bearing CRM-M-32903-3021 & Sandeep Singh bearing CRM-M-36121-2021.
2. The brief facts of the case as culled out from the complaint are as under:-
An investigation into the business activities of firms under subject has revealed that a group of persons as mentioned below have colluded and connived with each other to make a network of fake firms and defraud the state exchequer. All these below mentioned individuals have made a total of 40 firms and have evaded tax amounting to Rs.122.28 Crores. The common Email-ids, Phone numbers and PAN cards have been used in all these firms to get the registrations and pass on the fraudulent Input tax Credit (ITC) to various beneficiary firms. No tax has been ever paid in the inward supply chain of these firms and a mechanism has been devised by all these individuals to cover the movement of clandestine goods with fake invoices so that fraudulent ITC could be availed for adjustment against the output tax liability. Further bank accounts given/uploaded at the GSTN Portal of these firms are different than the bank accounts through which money transaction has happened and even parallel and fake bank accounts have been opened to withdraw the cash in some of these firms It is also pertinent to mention that huge cash has been collected/ withdrawn from the bank accounts by same and common persons. Different roles were assigned in this group of individuals amongst each other such as getting registration on the PAN of some individuals and cash withdrawals by some other persons of the group. The verification of inward supplies of these firms from the E-Way portal revealed that the inward supply chain of these firms is NIL at subsequent stages and these firms itself were also found to be non-existent at their registered place of business. All these individuals are therefore individually and severally responsible for defrauding the state exchequer. Accordingly a case for arrest of the following 7 persons has been granted by Commissioner of State Tax, Punjab.
1) Mr. Vinod kumar, S/o S! Om Parkash Street, 1.0. 12, Amloh road, Khanna, Ludhiana.
2) Mr. Maninder Sharma, S/o Sh. Satya Varat Rattan, Street no. 1, ward no. 4, Nandi colony, Khanna, Ludhiana.
3) Mr. Harvinder Singh,S/o Sh. Sukhdev Singh H.No. 3660, Filli Gate Jagraon, Ludhiana.
4) Mr. Sandeep Singh,S/o Sh. Ikbal Singh Nabha Colony No. 01 Khanna, Ludhiana
5) Mr. Amarinder Singh,S/o Sh. Gurnam Singh H.No. 428, Uchha Vehra, GT road Khanna, Ludhiana
6) Mr. Sunny Mehta, S/o Sh. Kuldeep Mehta, H.No. C/18 St. No. 3 Jagat Colony Khanna, Ludhiana.
7) Mr. Sukhdev Singh S/o Sh. Kartar Singh, Shiva Tower Over Lock Road Near OBC Bank Ludhiana.
The person wise details of tax evasion done through firms registered in the name of members of this groups is as below:-
| Sr.No. | Name of Person | Address | Firms Regd. In Punjab | Firms Regd. Outside Punjab | Total Firms Regd. | Tax evaded | Remarks |
| 1 | Vinod Kumar | Street No.12, Amloh Road, Khanna | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7,40,00,287/- |
|
| 2 | Maninder Sharma | Gali No.1, Ward No.4, Nandi Colony, Khanna | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6,31,89,852/- | In addition, an amount of Rs.1.99 Crores received from bogus bank A/c of M/s Laxmi Iron Traders |
| 3 | Harvinder Singh | H.No.3660, Filligate Jag | |||||
Anil Kumar versus State of Punjab 2013 (3) RCR(Cri) 854
Arnab Manoranjan Goswami vs. State of Maharashtra
Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar
Babba vs. State of Maharashtra
Bhadresh Bipinbhai Sheth vs. State of Gujarat and another
Bhagirrathsinh vs. State of Gujarat
Dipak Shubashchandra Mehta vs. C.B.I. and Anr.' 2012 (1) RCR(Cri) 870
Giri Raj versus State of Haryana
Gudikanti Narasimhulu vs. Public Prosecutor
Gurcharan Singh and Ors. vs. State
Gurcharan Singh vs. State (Delhi Admn.)
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav & Anr
Mahesh Kumar Bhawsinghka vs. State of Delhi
P. Chidambaram vs. Directorate of Enforcement
Prahlad Singh Bhati vs. NCT, Delhi
Puran Etc. vs. Rambilas & Anr. (2001) 6 SCC 338
Rajinder Kumar vs. State of Haryana
Ram Govind Upadhyay vs. Sudarshan Singh and Ors. (2002) 3 SCC 598
Sanjay Chandra vs. CBI (2012) 1 SCC 40
Sanjay Chandra versus CBI 2011 (4) RCR(Cri) 898
Seniors Fraud Investigation Office vs. Nittin Johari & Anr.; (2019) 9 SCC 165
Sharad T. Kabra versus Union of India 2017 (4) RCR(Cri) 108
Shri Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia vs. State of Punjab
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of Maharashtra
State of Bihar & Anr. vs. Amit Kumar
State of Gujarat vs. Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal
State of Kerala vs. Raneef (2011) 1 SCC 784
State of Rajasthan vs. Balchand
State of U.P. vs. Amarmani Tripathi
The court established that in cases of economic offences, while the gravity of the allegations is significant, the presumption of innocence and the nature of evidence must also be considered when dec....
The main legal point established is that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, and the decision to grant bail should consider the seriousness of the charge and the severity of the punishment.
The Court emphasized the right to a speedy trial under Article 21, asserting that undue delays in trial violate this right and warrant bail, even for serious offenses.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the presumption of innocence lies in favor of the accused, and the object of bail is to secure appearance at trial. The judgment also emphasiz....
The court established that under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the offence of money laundering is independent of the predicate offence, and the burden of proof lies on the accused to ....
The judgment emphasizes the need to balance personal liberty with the security of the community, considering the gravity of the alleged economic offences and the period of sentence.
In economic offences, bail is not a right; the burden rests on the applicant to show no risk of interference with justice or likelihood of guilt, reinforced by the position of the accused.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.