Back
ANOOP CHITKARA
Sumit Nandwani – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 36 | 16.12.2023 | Cyber Crime, Hisar, Haryana | 420, 201, 120-B IPC |
On 29 May 2024, this Court had passed a detailed order and also arraigned the Union of India, Ministry of Telecommunication, Government of India through Secretary and added it as party respondent No.2 in the petition, and the matter was posted immediately after vacations, i.e., for 01-Jul-2024. The order dated 29-May-2024, as far as it relates to the Union of India, shall be read as part and parcel of this order.
2. However, in the mean me, the government has no filed the Telecommunications Act, 2023, which came into force on 26 Jun 2024.
3. Given this, no response is required from the Union of India.
4. Cybercrime has been affecting people across the Na on, irrespective of religion, region, education, or class. Newspapers, Magazines, YouTube channels, and social media are brimming with the ordeals of an uncountable number of innocent victims of cybercrime, and these reports cannot be brushed aside as agendas. Reference made to paragraphs 6 and 7 of the previous order dated 29 May 2024 which reads as follows:-
The court granted bail to the petitioner due to extensive pre-trial custody, emphasizing the need for stringent conditions to prevent further offenses and ensure compliance during the trial.
Bail is the rule and committal to jail is an exception, and the court must consider the nature of the alleged offences, progress of investigation, and the presumption of innocence in deciding bail ap....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
