SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 298

S.K.PANIGRAHI
Pradeep Kumar Sethy – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Millan Kanungo, Sr. Advocate, for the Appellant;Mr. Manoj Kumar Mohanty, Asc, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. Both the matters are taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

BLAPL No.2023 of 2020

3. The Petitioner being in custody in connection with Sahadevkhunta Police Station Case No.144 of 2013 corresponding to C.T. Case No.1041 of 2013 pending before the court of learned S.D.J.M., Balasore registered for the alleged commission of offences under Sections 420, 406, 409 and 34 of the I.P.C. read with Sections 4 and 5 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978, has filed this petition under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for his release on bail.

4.The prosecution story, in brief, is that the informant and others had invested their hard earned money in the Artha Tatwa Group of Company under different schemes. Thereafter, the office of the finance company was closed and vanished from the locality due to which they are unable to get back their deposits for the last 10 months. Having found no other alternative, the informant and others went to the head office in Bhubaneshwar, but the said Head office was also closed. It has also been alleged therein that the petitioner along with other Directors assault

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top