SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 158

SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Basanta Kumar Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :M/s. G.N. Mishra & P.P. Mohanty, Advocates
For the Respondent: Mr. Priyabrata Tripathy, Adv

JUDGMENT :

SASHIKANTA MISHRA, J.

In the present revision the petitioner challenges order dated 23.12.2002 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Malkangiri in Criminal Appeal No. 31 of 1999, whereby the order of conviction and sentence passed by learned C.J.M., Malkangiri in G.R. case No. 317 of 2019 on 22.09.1995 was confirmed. By the said judgment, the trial court had convicted the petitioner accused for the offence under section 409 of IPC and sentenced him to imprisonment for 29 days.

2. The prosecution case, in a nutshell, is that the Divisional Forest Officer, Jeypore (KL) Division lodged an FIR before the Officer-in-charge of Orkel Police Station alleging that as per the audit report it was found that the petitioner while posted as the Range Officer, Balimela K.L. Range had misappropriated cash of rupees 4,52,491 .99. It was stated that he was entrusted with different amounts on different dates in advance for expenditure of Kendu leaves production, transportation, drying and storage etc. Basing on such report, investigation was taken up and charge sheet was submitted under section 409 of IPC.

The accused took the plea of denial during trial, wherein prosecution examined 13 witn

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top