SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 540

S. MURALIDHAR
Jitray @ Jitray Majhi – Appellant
Versus
Girish Chandra Mohanta – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Bhojaraj Seth, Advocate, Janmajaya Katikia, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ. - The challenge in the present petition is to an order dated 20th January, 2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Karanjia in Criminal Revision No.11 of 2013 declining to interfere with an order dated 6th December, 2012 passed by the S.D.J.M., Karanjia in not taking cognizance against the Opposite Party-Accused for the offence under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC and ST (POA) Act, 1989.

2. As noticed by the learned ASJ under 3(1)(x) of the SC and ST (POA) Act whoever not being a member of Schedule Caste (SC) or a Schedule Tribe (ST) intentionally insults or intimidates with intent to humiliate a member of SC or a ST in any place within the public view, is liable to be punished. The relevant portion of the impugned order in this regard reads as under:

    'It is alleged by the complainant that the accused scolded him in un-parliamentary language pointing to his tribe. While recording his statement U/s.200 Cr.P.C. he has only stated that the accused started abusing him by saying Maagiha Sala Adivasi Majhi etc. The witnesses Kailash Chandra Patra and Arjun Mohanta have stated that the accused abused the post master saying 'Majhi Sala Tote Kie C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top