SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 683

JASWANT SINGH, M. S. RAMAN
Nilendra Kumar Mahapatra – Appellant
Versus
Indian Oil Corporation – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Devashis Panda, Advocate for the petitioner, for the Appellant; Mr. Prafulla Kumar Rath, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Murahari Sri Raman, J. - This matter is taken up by virtual/physical mode.

2. The petitioner, an unsuccessful tenderer, has sought for the following reliefs:

    'Under the circumstances the petitioner most humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court may be graciously pleased to issue notice of Rule Nisi calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the rejection of petitioner's bid vide Annexure-1 should not be quashed as being illegal and arbitrary;

    And upon the opposite parties not showing cause/or insufficient cause being shown, this Hon'ble Court be further pleased to quash Annexure-1 for being illegal and null and void and the opposite parties and more particularly opposite party No.2 be directed to consider the petitioner's tender on merits subject to the petitioner meeting the other terms and conditions of the notice inviting tender and award him the work of transportation of IOCLs bulk petroleum products ex-IOCLs Bhubaneswar terminal;

    And pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper.'

3. The impugned Annexure-1 is the communication date

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top