The importance of accurate evidence recording and the limited scope for correction after the witness has signed the deposition sheet.

JUDGMENT

ORDER

S.K. Sahoo, J. - This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).

2. Heard Mr. Gyanaloka Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The petitioner Siddhachit Roy @ Suddhachit Roy has filed this revision petition challenging the order dated 20.12.2021 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Anandapur in 1.C.C. Case No.165 of 2013 in rejecting the petition filed by the learned counsel for the accused (petitioner) for correcting the recording of the petitioner's evidence who was examined as D.W.1.

4. The petitioner is facing trial for commission of an offence under section 138 of the N.I. Act and after the closure of the evidence from the side of the complainant and recording of the accused statement, the petitioner examined himself as D.W.1. In fact, he filed the evidence affidavit whereafter he was examined further by his own counsel in examination in-chief and then he was cross-examined by the learned counsel for the complainant-opposite party. After the cross-examination was over, it seems that the evidence was read over to the petitioner and explained and thereafter he signed the deposition sheet on each page on 08.12.2021. The counsel for the petitioner filed a petition on 15.12.2021 in the trial Court indicating therein that some questions were put to him by the counsel for the complainant and correct answers were given but the same has been wrongly recorded by the Court and therefore, a prayer was made to correct the recording of the evidence.

5. Learned counsel for the complainant filed objection to such petition.

6. After hearing both the parties, the learned trial Court has been pleased to hold that after recording of evidence, the same was read over and explained to D.W.1 and after finding it to be true and correct, he has put his signature and therefore, the prayer to make changes in the evidence cannot be done without bringing D.W.1 (petitioner) to the dock and accordingly, the petition was rejected.

7. Mr. Gyanaloka Mohanty, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that after receipt of the certified copy of the deposition, it came to the notice of the learned counsel for the accused (petitioner) about the wrong recording made by the Court and immediately the petition was filed for correcting the same. It is submitted that the petitioner is a graduate and it was his duty to immediately point out the same to the learned trial Court while putting his signature but he could not verify the evidence thoroughly when he put his signature and for his laches, he should not be deprived of the opportunity in bringing it to the notice of the Court regarding wrong recording of his evidence which has far reaching consequences.

8. Section 278 of Cr.P.C. deals with procedure in regard to the evidence when it is completed and it states, inter alia, that as the evidence of each witness taken under section 275 or section 276 of Cr.P.C. is completed, it shall be read over to him in the presence of the accused, if in attendance, or of his pleader, if he appears by pleader, and shall, if necessary, be corrected and it is further provided that if the witness denies the correctness of any part of the evidence when the same is read over to him, the Magistrate or Presiding Officer may, instead of correcting the evidence, make a memorandum thereon of the objection made to it by the witness and shall add such remarks as he thinks necessary. It is further provided that if the record of the evidence is in a language different from that in which it has been given and the witness does not understand that language, the record shall be interpreted to him in the language in which it was given, or in a language which he understands.

9. Sub-section (3) of section 278 of Cr.P.C. is not attracted in this case since the petitioner is a graduate and he gave the evidence affidavit in English and after he deposed, his deposition was also recorded in English and he went through the same and put his signa