SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 672

S. K. SAHOO
Siddhachit Roy @ Siddhachit Roy – Appellant
Versus
Rabindra Kumar Mallick – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Gyanaloka Mohanty, Advocate, for the Appellant;

JUDGMENT

ORDER

1. This matter arrangement (video n up through Hybrid zing/physical mode).

2. Heard Mr. Gyanaloka Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The petitione oy @ Suddhachit Roy has filed this revision petition challenging the order dated 20.12.2021 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Anandapur in 1.C.C. Case No.165 of 2013 in rejecting the petition filed by the learned counsel for the accused (petitioner) for correcting the recording of the petitioner's evidence who was examined as D.W.1.

4. The petitioner is facing trial for commission of an offence under section 138 of the N.I. Act and after the closure of the evidence from the side of the complainant and recording of the accused statement, the petitioner examined himself as D.W.1. In fact, he filed the evidence affidavit whereafter he was examined further by his own counsel in examination in-chief and then he was cross-examined by the learned counsel for the complainant-opposite party. After the cross-examination was over, it seems that the evidence was read over to the petitioner and explained and thereafter he signed the deposition sheet on the petiti each page on 08.12.2021. The counsel for oner filed a petition on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top