SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 101

R. K. PATTANAIK
Sudhansu Sekhar Jena – Appellant
Versus
Kalpana Parida – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Gautam Routray, Advocate, Satrughna Dash, Advocate

JUDGMENT

R.K. Pattanaik, J. - Instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioner assailing the impugned order dated 22nd July, 2022 passed in Criminal Execution No.27 of 2020 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Bhubaneswar arising out of CRP No.83 of 2013 pending disposal of CMC Nos.8 of 2019 and 01 of 2021 corresponding to Criminal Execution Nos.27 of 2020 and 51 of 2022 respectively on the grounds stated inter alia that issuance and execution of NBWA towards recovery and realization of arrear maintenance is unjustified and untenable in law and hence the same is liable to be interferred with and set aside with a consequential direction to consider and dispose of applications filed under Section 126(2) Cr.P.C. as the maintenance directed and payable to the opposite parties was allowed ex-parte.

2. While dealing with the execution proceeding, the learned Family Court vide the impugned order 22nd July, 2022 in Criminal Execution No.27 of 2020 denying recall of DW moved by the petitioner and since the arrear dues was not paid to the opposite parties despite opportunities provided, issued NBWA against him. Being aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner approa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top