SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 62

V. NARASINGH
Maheswar Dash – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
M.K. Khuntia, Advocate, D.R. Bhokta, Advocate

JUDGMENT

V. Narasingh, J. - The petitioner being duly selected was appointed as a constable under the Opposite Party No. 2 (Deputy Inspector General, CISF, NEZ, East Kolkata Township, Kolkata) on 30.3.82.

2. He was dismissed from service by order dated 30.11 1991. The said order of dismissal, on the representation of the petitioner was modified to one of compulsory retirement from service with effect from 30.11.1991 by the Revisional Authorities in terms of its order dated 2/3rd of April, 1998 at Annexure-3. In the said order it was mentioned that the petitioner is entitled to draw two third compensation pension and gratuity as admissible.

3. Being aggrieved by the amount of gratuity and compensation pension paid to him in terms of the order at Annexure-3, the petitioner approached this court by filing W.P.(C) No. 15549/2013 with a prayer to modify the punishment order and granting pension. By order dated 5.3.2014, this Court disposed of the said Writ Petition directing the Opposite Party No. 2 to dispose of the appeal keeping in view sub Rule-3 of Rule 40 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 (herein after referred to as CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972).

4. The Opposite Party

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top