SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 182

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
Murahari Sri Raman, J.
Balaram Behera - Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha & Ors. - Respondents
WPC (OAC) No. 2513 of 2016
Decided On : 06-11-2023

Advocates:
M/s. Sameer Kumar Das, Advocate, S.K. Mishra, P.K. Behera, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Sachidananda Nayak, Additional Standing Counsel, for the Respondent.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court established that the unfitness of the first legal heir for employment does not disqualify the second legal heir from being considered for compassionate appointment under the Rehabilitation Assistance Rules, emphasizing the humanitarian intent behind such provisions.

Headnote:

REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE - COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT - Orissa Civil Service (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 1990; Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - The court discussed the provisions of the Orissa Civil Service (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 1990, particularly Rule 2(b) regarding the order of preference for family members in compassionate appointments, and Rule 4 which outlines the purpose of the scheme. The court interpreted these rules to allow for the appointment of a second legal heir when the first legal heir is found medically unfit for employment. The court emphasized the humanitarian objective of the scheme, which is to prevent the family of a deceased government employee from facing financial distress. This interpretation influenced the court's decision to allow the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the return of documents related to his application for compassionate appointment under the Orissa Civil Service (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 1990, after the death of his father, a government employee. The first legal heir, the petitioner's mother, was found medically unfit for employment, leading the petitioner to seek engagement under the rules.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the return of documents by the Directorate of AYUSH was improper, as the first legal heir was medically unfit, and the affidavits from family members indicated no objection to the petitioner being appointed. The court emphasized the need to consider the family's distress and the humanitarian purpose of the rehabilitation scheme.

Issues: Whether the petitioner, as the second legal heir, is entitled to apply for compassionate appointment under the Orissa Civil Service (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 1990, when the first legal heir is available but medically unfit.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the provisions of the Rehabilitation Assistance Rules do not preclude the second legal heir from being considered for appointment if the first legal heir is unfit for employment. The court reinforced that compassionate appointments are meant to alleviate the financial distress of families of deceased government employees.

Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, directing the Directorate of AYUSH to reconsider the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment in light of the court's observations, and to complete the process within three months.

JUDGMENT

Murahari Sri Raman, J. -

THE CHALLENGE:

Questioning the propriety of returning the documents (except death and legal heir certificate) enclosed to Letter No.94, dated 28.01.2015 of the Deputy Superintendent, Government Ayurvedic Hospital, Bhubaneswar, who suggested for consideration of appointment of the son of deceased Government employee, died in harness, under the Orissa Civil Service (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 1990 (in short, 'RA Rules'), citing that wife of the deceased Government employee comes first in the order of preference, the petitioner had approached the Orissa Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack by way of filing Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, which was registered as O.A. No.2513 (C) of 2016, with a prayer to direct the opposite party No.2-Director, AYUSH, Odisha, Bhubaneswar 'to engage the applicant under the Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme of the State Government in any of the available vacancy and to grant all consequential service and financial benefits to him'.

1.1. After abolition of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal by virtue of Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of Personnel and Training) Notification F. No. A-11014/10/2015-AT [G.S.R.552(E).], dated 2nd August, 2019), the said case having been transferred to this Court, O.A. No. 2513 (C) of 2016 has been re-registered as WPC (OAC) No.2513 of 2016.

THE FACTS:

2. The factual matrix as adumbrated by the petitioner reveals that father of the petitioner, Late Mukunda Behera, who was working as cook in Government Ayurvedic Hospital, Bhubaneswar, having joined on 06.05.1977, died in harness on 08.10.2014 leaving behind wife, two sons and one daughter.

2.1. The first legal heir, namely, Smt. Pramila Behera, mother of the petitioner, though comes first in order of preference as per Rule 2(b) of the RA Rules, was found to be suffering from 'Hypertension with poly arthritis'. Since the physician advised rest due to ill-health, the Establishment Officer, Directorate of AYUSH by Letter bearing No.5951-OE-I(a)-5/2015/AYUSH, dated 27.06.2015 requested the Chief District Medical Officer, Khordha for convening Medical Board 'for examination of health condition of Smt. Behera and report findings of the Board to this Directorate for further action'.

2.2. Accordingly, on the request vide Letter No.6767, dated 25.07.2015 of the Chief District Medical Officer, Khordha, the District Medical Board being constituted comprising Specialist in Orthopaedic, Specialist in Opthalmology and Specialist in Medicine, the following report was submitted on 05.08.2015:

    'Medical Board examination of Smt. Pramila Behera, W/o. Late Dasarathi Behera on dated 05.08.2015 as per the CDMO, Khordha Letter No.6767 dated 25.07.2015.

    On examination and verification of treatment papers of Smt. Pramila Behera, it is found that she is suffering from Hypertension with poly arthritis. She is unable to walk properly. So she is unfit for the Govt. job.'

2.3. Since mother was found to be unfit for undertaking Government job, the petitioner, unmarried son, applied for engagement under the RA Rules, 1990, as his elder married brother and married sister expressed their unwillingness to undertake employment. Accordingly, they have sworn to affidavits indicating 'no objection' in case the petitioner is given employment under the said Rules.

2.4. In consideration of the application for engagement, the Deputy Superintendent, Government Ayurvedic Hospital, Bhubaneswar forwarded necessary documents including affidavits showing no objection by mother, brother and sister along with such application form to the Director of AYUSH, Odisha, Bhubaneswar for consideration of appointment of the petitioner. However, the Directorate of AYUSH, Odisha, Bhubaneswar vide Letter No. 3594- OE.I.(a).V.5/2015/AYUSH, dated 23.03.2015 (Annexure- 5) has returned the documents (except death and legal heir certificate) to the Deputy Superintend

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top