IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Sandeep Kumar Ghadei S/o Late Dilip Kumar Ghadei – Appellant
Versus
Secretary to Government of Odisha Department of Commerce & Transport (Commerce) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding rejection of appointment application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. opposition response indicating legal grounds for rejection. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. petitioner’s arguments against the rejection based on ra rules. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's observations on prior cases and ra rules interpretation. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. deeper interpretation of terms in ra rules as affecting case. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. legal conclusions leading to the decision of appointment eligibility. (Para 14 , 15 , 17) |
| 7. final decision of the court and directives to consider the application. (Para 19 , 20) |
JUDGMENT :
MURAHARI SRI RAMAN, J.
THE CHALLENGE BY THE PETITIONER
1. Challenging the propriety and legality of decision rejecting the application for consideration of appointment under the provisions of the Odisha Civil Services (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 1990 communicated vide Letter No. PRE(N) 17/2015 (Pt.)— 5864/Com., dated 30.10.2015 of the Under Secretary to Government of Odisha in Commerce and Transport (Commerce) Department as at Annexure-7 and Letter No. Estt. Sec-1, 59/2014— 3112/PSP, dated 19.11.2015 issued by Director, Directorate of Printing, Stationery & Publication, Odisha, Madhupatn
Bhavnagar University Vs. Palitana Sugar Mill Pvt. Ltd.
Shri Ishar Alloy Steels Limited Vs. Jayaswals Neco Limited
Executive Officer Vs. E. Tirupalu
Secretary, Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission Vs. Y.V.V.R. Srinivasulu
State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Om Prakash
Abdul Hameed Vs. Union of India
State of Haryana Vs. Ankur Gupta
State of U.P. Vs. Arvind Kumar Srivastava
State of Karnataka Vs. C. Lalitha
State of Karnataka Vs. C. Lalitha
Malaya Nanda Sethy Vs. State of Odisha
Pabitra Mohan Palei Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Odisha, Bhubaneswar
A son of a deceased government employee is eligible for compassionate appointment under the Odisha RA Rules if the spouse is unfit for work.
The court established that the unfitness of the first legal heir for employment does not disqualify the second legal heir from being considered for compassionate appointment under the Rehabilitation ....
The court reaffirmed that applications for compassionate appointments must be considered under rules applicable at the time of the deceased's death to avoid undue hardship, overriding newer rules tha....
Married daughters of deceased Government servants are entitled to be considered for appointment under the Odisha Civil Service (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 1990, if they fulfill the requirement....
Compassionate Appointment – Considering object and purpose of appointment on compassionate grounds, authorities must consider and decide such applications for appointment on compassionate grounds as ....
Compassionate appointments must adhere to the eligibility criteria existing at the time of the employee's death, and retrospective application of new rules is not permissible.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the consideration of a claim under a scheme should be based on the rules prevalent at the time of the event (in this case, the death of the de....
Compassionate appointment scheme applicable is that prevalent at employee's death date, not later modifications.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.