IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MURAHARI SRI RAMAN, J.
Sandeep Kumar Ghadei S/o Late Dilip Kumar Ghadei – Appellant
Versus
Secretary to Government of Odisha Department of Commerce & Transport (Commerce) – Respondent
WPC (OAC) No. 4126 of 2016
Decided On : 12-02-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding rejection of appointment application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. opposition response indicating legal grounds for rejection. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. petitioner’s arguments against the rejection based on ra rules. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's observations on prior cases and ra rules interpretation. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. deeper interpretation of terms in ra rules as affecting case. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. legal conclusions leading to the decision of appointment eligibility. (Para 14 , 15 , 17) |
| 7. final decision of the court and directives to consider the application. (Para 19 , 20) |
JUDGMENT :
MURAHARI SRI RAMAN, J.
THE CHALLENGE BY THE PETITIONER
1. Challenging the propriety and legality of decision rejecting the application for consideration of appointment under the provisions of the Odisha Civil Services (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 1990 communicated vide Letter No. PRE(N) 17/2015 (Pt.)— 5864/Com., dated 30.10.2015 of the Under Secretary to Government of Odisha in Commerce and Transport (Commerce) Department as at Annexure-7 and Letter No. Estt. Sec-1, 59/2014— 3112/PSP, dated 19.11.2015 issued by Director, Directorate of Printing, Stationery & Publication, Odisha, Madhupatna, Cuttack (Annexure-8), the petitioner, son of the deceased Government employee, came up before the Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack by way of filing application invoking provisions of Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, registered as O.A.No.4126 (C) of 2016.
1.1. After abolition of the Odisha Administrative Tribunal by virtue of Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of Personnel and Training) Notification F. No. A-11014/10/2015-AT [G.S.R.552(E).], dated 2nd August, 2019), the said case having been transferred to this Court, O.A. No. 4126 (C) of 2016 has been re-registered as WPC (OAC) No. 4126 of 2016.
FACTS AS ADUMBRATED BY THE PETITIONERS
2. The petitioner, on the death of his father, died in harness on 16.12.2012 while working as driver in the Office of Director, Printing, Stationery & Publication, Odisha, made an application on 26.03.2013 for consideration of appointment under the Odisha Civil Services (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 1990 (for brevity, “RA Rules”), for Smt. Santilata Ghadei, the wife of the deceased employee, Late Dilip Kumar Ghadei, was found unfit to undertake Government job certified by the Standing Medical Board convened on 01.10.2013 vide Letter No. 6358, Berhampur, dated 03.10.2013 issued by the Chief District Medical Officer, Ganjam, Berhampur (Annexure-3 series).
2.1. The Director, Directorate of Printing, Stationery and Publication, Odisha vide Memo No.1854, dated 28.03.2014 having requested the Collector, Cuttack to submit report regarding the financial status of the petitioner, after due enquiry being conducted, distress certificate in favour of the petitioner was furnished to the opposite party No.2-Director vide Letter No.2747/Gen. &Misc., dated 05.08.2014.
2.2. The said report along with other necessary and relevant documents being sent to the Government, the application for appointment under the RA Rules came to be rejected on 30.10.2015 by the Government of Odisha in Commerce & Transport (Commerce) Department citing that the claim is contradictory to the provisions of Rule 2(b) of RA Rules, as the mother of the petitioner is still alive/available for appointment.
2.3. Questioning the legal sanctity of decision taken to reject the application and asserting that such decision is beyond the weight of evidence on record, the petitioner moved the learned Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack for ventilation of grievance under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, which has travelled to this Court for final adjudication.
REPLIES OF THE OPPOSITE PARTIES TO THE CONTENTS OF THE WRIT PETITION
3. Having admitted the fact of Standing Medical Board declared Smt. Santilata Ghadei, mother of the petitioner unfit to undertake Gover
Bhavnagar University Vs. Palitana Sugar Mill Pvt. Ltd.
Shri Ishar Alloy Steels Limited Vs. Jayaswals Neco Limited
Executive Officer Vs. E. Tirupalu
Secretary, Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission Vs. Y.V.V.R. Srinivasulu
State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Om Prakash
Abdul Hameed Vs. Union of India
State of Haryana Vs. Ankur Gupta
State of U.P. Vs. Arvind Kumar Srivastava
State of Karnataka Vs. C. Lalitha
State of Karnataka Vs. C. Lalitha
Malaya Nanda Sethy Vs. State of Odisha
Pabitra Mohan Palei Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Odisha, Bhubaneswar
A son of a deceased government employee is eligible for compassionate appointment under the Odisha RA Rules if the spouse is unfit for work.
The court established that the unfitness of the first legal heir for employment does not disqualify the second legal heir from being considered for compassionate appointment under the Rehabilitation ....
The court reaffirmed that applications for compassionate appointments must be considered under rules applicable at the time of the deceased's death to avoid undue hardship, overriding newer rules tha....
Married daughters of deceased Government servants are entitled to be considered for appointment under the Odisha Civil Service (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 1990, if they fulfill the requirement....
Compassionate Appointment – Considering object and purpose of appointment on compassionate grounds, authorities must consider and decide such applications for appointment on compassionate grounds as ....
Compassionate appointments must adhere to the eligibility criteria existing at the time of the employee's death, and retrospective application of new rules is not permissible.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the consideration of a claim under a scheme should be based on the rules prevalent at the time of the event (in this case, the death of the de....
Compassionate appointment scheme applicable is that prevalent at employee's death date, not later modifications.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.