JUDGMENT

A.C. Behera, J.

This 2nd appeal has been preferred against the confirming judgment.

2. The appellant of this 2nd appeal was the defendant before the trial court in the suit vide T.S. No.13 of 1984 and she was the respondent before the 1st appellate court in the 1st appeal vide T.A. No.20 of 1987.

3. The respondents of this 2nd appeal were the plaintiffs before the trial court in the suit vide T.S. No.13 of 1984 and they were the respondents before the 1st appellate court in the 1st appeal vide T.A. No.20 of 1987.

4. The suit of the plaintiffs (respondents in this 2nd appeal) before the trial court vide T.S. No.13 of 1984 was a suit for declaration.

5. The case of the plaintiffs before the trial court in the suit vide T.S. No.13 of 1984 as per their pleadings against the defendant was that, Braja Kuanr was their common ancestor. Braja Kuanr died leaving behind his three sons, i.e., Khaga, Laxman and Padman. Khaga died issueless. Laman Kuanr died leaving behind his two sons, i.e., Bada and Sada. Bada died leaving behind his two sons, i.e., Gohardhan(plaintiff no.1) and Balabhadra(plaintiff no.2). Sada died leaving behind his one son, i.e., Rathi Kuanr and that Rathi died leaving b