SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ori) 28

S. K. SAHOO, R. K. PATTANAIK
State of Odisha – Appellant
Versus
Sk. Asif Alli @ Md. Asif Iqbal – Respondent


Advocates:
Sk. Zafarulla, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Bibhu Prasad Tripathy Addl. Govt. Advocate, for the Respondent.

Table of Content
1. referring to criminal cases under ipc and pocso act. (Para 1 , 2)
2. trial court's findings and sentencing. (Para 3 , 4)
3. details regarding the prosecution and witnesses. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. arguments by the defense regarding circumstantial evidence. (Para 8 , 9)
5. analysis of circumstantial evidence and the court's reasoning. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
6. evaluation of the legal standard for capital punishment. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
7. final verdict and implications of the judgment. (Para 23 , 24 , 25)

JUDGMENT

S.K. Sahoo, J.

The reference under section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been submitted to this Court by the learned Adhoc Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.S.C., POCSO, Jagatsinghpur (hereinafter 'the trial Court') in Special G.R. Case No.30 of 2014 for confirmation of death sentence imposed on Sk. Asif Alli @ Md. Asif Iqbal and Sk. Akil Alli (hereinafter 'the appellants') vide judgment and order dated 29.11.2022 and accordingly, DSREF No.01 of 2022 has been instituted. CRLA No.120 of 2023 has been filed by appellant Sk. Asif Alli @ Md. Asif Iqbal and CRLA No.121 of 2023 has been filed by appellant Sk. Akil Alli challenging

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top