Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.K.PANIGRAHI
Lal Baba Dargha (Mazahar) – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT:
S.K. Panigrahi, J.
1. The Petitioner, in the present Writ Petition, is challenging the initiation of O.P.P. Case No.55/2015 by the Sub-Collector-cum-Estate Officer, Sadar, Sundargarh, under the Orissa Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1972.
2. The Petitioner is further assailing the appellate order dated 19.07.2016 passed by the Collector, Sundargarh, whereby the appeal was dismissed and the eviction order dated 26.09.2015 passed by the Sub-Collector-cum-Estate Officer, Sadar, Sundargarh was upheld.
I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE
3. The brief facts of the case are as follows :
(i) The Petitioner is a religious institution of the Muslim community situated at Rajgangpur in
The classification of land as 'Rasta' falls under the definition of 'public premises' in the eviction statute, thus the eviction proceedings initiated against unauthorized occupants are legally valid....
The judgment emphasized the importance of compliance with legal provisions for eviction notices and highlighted the need for specific retrospective provisions in legislation to take away protected ri....
Unauthorized occupation of public premises does not confer legal rights; eviction proceedings must adhere to statutory requirements, and alleged violations of natural justice must be substantiated.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the definition of public premises under the U.P. Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1972 and the re....
The central legal point established is the determination of the applicability of the U.P. Public Premises Act and the UPZA&LR Act to the disputed land, based on their definitions and relevant notific....
The petitioner failed to demonstrate a legal right to remain on government land, with unauthorized possession lacking sufficient evidence for entitlement under the OPLE Act.
Only the designated authority under the Orissa Prevention of Land Encroachment Act can initiate eviction proceedings, and unauthorized occupants cannot claim legal rights to public land.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article