SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 206

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
Dulla Kisku – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S.N. Sahoo
For the Respondent: A.K. Apat

Table of Content
1. conviction under e.c. act based on evidence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. trial court's reasoning for conviction. (Para 5)
3. arguments focused on sentencing and appellant's background. (Para 6 , 8)
4. judicial reliance on precedent for probation eligibility. (Para 9 , 10)
5. appeal disposed with probation instead of imprisonment. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT :

1. The present Criminal Appeal, filed by the appellant under Section 374 of the Cr. P.C., is directed against the judgment and order dated 09.08.1996 passed by the learned Special Court, Mayurbhanj, Baripada in G.R. Case No.23 of 1989/T.C. No.6 of 1990, whereby the learned trial Court has convicted the accused-appellant along with another accused for the offences punishable under Section 7 and 8 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (herein after ‘E.C. Act’ for brevity) and, accordingly, sentenced them to undergo R.I. for three months each.

3. The prosecution case in brief and terse is that on 23.02.1989, the house of the appellant was raided by P.W.3, a Vigilance Inspector along with the then authorities from the Supply Department and it was found that a large quantity of rice and paddy have been stored. Two trucks beari

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top