SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 548

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
G.SATAPATHY
Tarun Kumar Parida – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : S. Panda
For the Respondent: S.S. Pradhan

Table of Content
1. details of appellant's conviction and the context of the offence. (Para 1 , 3)
2. appellant's request for leniency and use of the p.o. act. (Para 2)
3. court's assessment of sentencing under probation provisions. (Para 4 , 6)
4. cited cases supporting the discretionary use of probation. (Para 5)
5. final judgment maintaining conviction while modifying the sentence. (Para 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT :

1. An appeal having come to be filed U/S.374(2) of Cr.P.C. by the appellant assailing his conviction for offence U/S.7 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (in short the E.C. Act) and sentence to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of three months and to a pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- in default whereof, to undergo further R.I. for 40 days as passed/recorded on 17.08.1994 by the learned Judge, Special Court, Phulbani in 2(c).C.C. Case No.1 of 1991.

3. In view of the specific submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this Court clarifies it not to recapitulate the facts of the case in extenso, but limits itself to state the necessary facts for disposal of this appeal as, on 25.12.1990, the complainant-Marketing Inspector, Phulbani being assisted by other Government offi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top