Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.K. PANIGRAHI
Station Manager, Railway Station, Balangir Town – Appellant
Versus
Chairman, Permanent Lok Adalat (PSU), Balangir – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. legal arguments regarding jurisdiction. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's analysis of lok adalat's authority. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court’s final reasoning. (Para 8) |
| 5. outcome of the writ petition. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT :
S.K. Panigrahi, J.
1. The Petitioners through this Writ Petition have challenged the award dated 04.07.2014 in P.L.A Case No 43 of 2013 passed by the Learned Chairman, Permanent Lok Adalat (PSU), Bolangir-Sonepur-Balangir allowing the P.L.A Case No 43 of 2013.
I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE
2. The brief fact of the case which may be put succinctly as follows:
(i) Opposite Party Nos.2 and 3, who are Advocates of the Balangir Bar Association filed an application under Section 22G of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 praying for issuance of a direction to the Petitioners to install Coach Indication Boards at Titilagarh, Balangir Railway Station. In the absence of such Coach Indication Board, the general public are facing lot of inconveniences. The case was registered and numbered as PLA Case No.43/2013.
(ii) The Petitioners, who were arrayed as Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in the said PLA case filed two written statements statin
Permanent Lok Adalats lack the jurisdiction to decide policy matters and should act only as conciliators in disputes, not as adjudicative bodies.
The Permanent Lok Adalat has jurisdiction to entertain and determine disputes relating to public utility services, including pension services, under Section 22C(1) of the Legal Services Authorities A....
Once there is no compromise and/or a settlement between parties before Lok Adalat, matter has to be returned to Court from where matter was referred to Lok Adalat for deciding the matter on merits by....
Permanent Lok Adalat cannot grant decrees for adoption, as its jurisdiction is limited to public utility services only.
Permanent Lok Adalat has jurisdiction to adjudicate compensation claims under the Motor Vehicles Act after conciliation efforts fail, affirming its authority and established processes.
The Permanent Lok Adalat lacks jurisdiction over disputes not directly related to public utility services, and procedural fairness, including the right to cross-examine, is essential for valid adjudi....
The Permanent Lok Adalat can decide a dispute only after following the procedure outlined in Section 22C of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
Lok Adalat cannot perform any adjudicatory function in terms of Section 20 of LSA Act – Permanent Lok Adalat would proceed to adjudication of a dispute on its merits only after attempting and failing....
Permanent Lok Adalat jurisdiction limited to pre-litigation public utility service disputes; mandatory conciliation required before merits adjudication, irrespective of party non-appearance.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
