Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SANJEEB K.PANIGRAHI
Rojesh Nayak – Appellant
Versus
C.G.M. (Tech) & Regional Officer National Highway Authority of India, Regional Officer, Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background and details of land acquisition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. arguments supporting inclusion of all structure components. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. counterarguments defending exclusions based on statutory interpretation. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. limits of judicial intervention in arbitration. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. statutory scheme for compensation and its application. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. assessment of structure value under the national highways act. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 7. clarification on authority's role in valuations. (Para 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 8. validity of statutory interpretations and limits on appeals. (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 9. necessity of adhering to statutory limits in compensation. (Para 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 10. final judgment confirming previous decisions. (Para 46 , 47 , 48) |
JUDGMENT :
1. This Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “A&C Act”) is preferred by the Appellant challenging the Order dated 5.8.2024, in Arbitration Misc. Case No. 2 of 2023, passed by the Learned District Judge, Bhadrak, in an Application filed under Section 34 of the Act, which wa
Compensation for land acquisition excludes Electrical Installation and Public Health costs as they are not recognized under relevant statutes.
Judicial intervention in arbitral awards is restricted, requiring adherence to statutory valuation methods ensuring fair compensation for land acquisition, as per applicable laws.
Limited judicial interference with arbitral land compensation awards under Sec.34/37; enhancement for commercial use upheld; separate easementary compensation allowed in partial acquisition affecting....
Court held that an arbitrator cannot remand matters back to competent authority after initial determination, affirming the arbitrary powers under Section 3G(5) of NHAI Act and the doctrine of acquies....
Post-notification sale deeds admissible for compensation if proximate, genuine, uninflated; severance awards upheld on uncontroverted evidence; minimal judicial interference in arbitral awards absent....
Section 29A of Arbitration Act inapplicable to arbitrations under Section 3G(5) of National Highways Act as special code; Central Government exclusive appointment overrides court extension/substituti....
The nature and status of the land on the date of notification must be considered in determining compensation for land acquired under the NHAI Act, 1956, and settled legal principles must be applied i....
The court established that under statutory arbitration for land acquisition, the authority must ensure fair compensation based on proper assessment and documentation, highlighting a constitutional ob....
The court upheld the authority to modify arbitration awards in compensation cases if the original decision is perverse or against public policy, ensuring fair compensation is granted to landowners.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
